ReviewInternational journal of cardiac imaging1998
How to standardize vasomotor tone in serial studies based on quantitation of coronary dimensions?
Review in International journal of cardiac imaging, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A clinical strategy to improve the diagnostic performance of 3T non-contrast coronary MRA and noninvasively evaluate coronary distensibility: combination of diastole and systole imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- Noninvasive test of nitrate-induced coronary vasomotion by 1.5-T whole-heart 3D magnetic resonance angiography using a T2-prepared SSFP sequence.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2012Article
- Using multidetector computed tomography in a swine model to assess the effects of sublingual nitroglycerin and intravenous adenosine on epicardial coronary arteries.Comparative medicine · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with coronary artery disease including those after coronary bypass graft operation and heart transplantation intervention studies based on serial quantitative coronary angiography, in part combined with intravascular ultrasound, are of increasing relevance. Since vasomotor tone of epicardial coronary arteries is influenced by a variety of factors, angiographic follow-up studies require standardization of coronary tone by induction of maximal dilation. We reviewed the effects of the most potent coronary vasodilatory drug groups, calcium antagonists and nitrocompounds, on coronary diameters. Intravenous or intracoronary injections of verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine, nicardipine, and nisoldipine can cause profound coronary dilation which has been shown to be maximal with verapamil and nisoldipine. Shortcomings of calcium antagonists include short or unknown duration of action after bolus administration, severe drop in blood pressure, and lack of commercial availability of solutions for injection of many substances. Isosorbide dinitrate induces profound coronary dilation; however, after sublingual administration marked blood pressure decrease can occur, and the duration of action and ideal dose of intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate has not been investigated yet. Injections of molsidomine and its active metabolite, SIN-1, cause longlasting, reproducible, maximal coronary dilation, although only after a waiting period of at least 10 minutes; unfortunately, SIN-1 is only commercially available in France. Nitroglycerin induces reproducible maximal coronary dilation and is easy to administer sublingually or as intracoronary bolus injection with rapid onset of action and no major side effects. The short duration of action may require repeated administrations. To date, repeated intracoronary bolus injections of 0.1 mg nitroglycerin every 10 minutes seem to be the optimal known regimen for standardization of coronary vasomotor tone in serial angiographic studies. Further investigations in this field with old and new vasodilatory drugs are recommendable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.