Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10450521›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews1999

Viruses, host responses, and autoimmunity.

M S Horwitz, N Sarvetnick

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Nervous System Manifestations of Arboviral Infections.Current tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Review
  4. Emerging Roles of Coronavirus in Autoimmune Diseases.Archives of medical research · 2021
    Review
  5. Coronavirus-induced autoimmunity.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  6. Autoimmune Pemphigus: Latest Advances and Emerging Therapies.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toll-like receptors in multiple sclerosis.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toll-like receptors and IFN-alpha: partners in autoimmunity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2006
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Virus-mediated autoimmunity in Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of autoimmune diseases · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M S HorwitzDepartment of Immunology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
N Sarvetnick
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conceptually, the initiation of autoimmune disease can be described as a three-stage process involving both genetic and environmental influences. This process begins with the development of an autoimmune cellular repertoire, followed by activation of these autoreactive cells in response to a localized target and, finally, the immune system's failure to regulate these self-reactive constituents. Viruses have long been associated with inciting autoimmune disorders. Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain how a viral infection can overcome immunological tolerance to self-components and initiate an organ-specific autoreactive process; these mechanisms are molecular mimicry and bystander activation. Both pathways, as discussed here, could play pivotal roles in the development of autoimmunity without necessarily excluding each other. Transgene technology has allowed us and others to examine more closely the roles of these mechanisms in mice and to dissect the requirements for initiating disease. These results demonstrate that bystander activation is the most likely explanation for disease development. Additional evidence suggests a further role for viruses in the reactivation and chronicity of autoimmune diseases. In this scenario, a second invasion by a previously infecting virus may restimulate already existing autoreactive lymphocytes, and thereby contribute to the diversity of the immune response.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansInflammationLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, TransgenicMolecular MimicryOrgan SpecificityVirus DiseasesViruses

Identifiers

PMID10450521
PMCPMC7165657
OpenAlexW2039616622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.