Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10447712›Full record

ArticleImmunology1999

Selective protection by hsp 70 against cytotoxic drug-, but not Fas-induced T-cell apoptosis.

E M Creagh, T G Cotter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E M CreaghTumour Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
T G Cotter
University College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon of heat-shock (HS) protection to many cytotoxic insults has previously been described; however, the specific molecular mechanism underlying this HS-mediated protection remains undefined. To gain insight into this protective mechanism, heat-shocked Jurkat T cells were treated with a range of cytotoxic agents. Those against which HS conferred protection (camptothecin and actinomycin D) were compared with agents against which HS showed no protective effect (anti-Fas monoclonal antibody (mAb)). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was found to be an event common to apoptosis induced by camptothecin and actinomycin D, whereas Fas-mediated apoptosis was shown to occur via a ROS-independent mechanism. The selective protection observed against these agents was found to be mimicked by pretreatment with antioxidant compounds. Furthermore, this antioxidant protection appears to be occurring downstream of ROS production. Experiments were extended using heat-shock protein (hsp) 70 gene-transfected Jurkat T cells to confirm that the protective effects observed were caused by hsp 70 synthesis rather than any other cellular response to HS. Bcl-2 expression levels were also examined to determine whether any correlation existed between Bcl-2- and hsp 70-mediated protection.

Indexed as

Heat-Shock ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsApoptosisBlotting, WesternCamptothecinDactinomycinfas ReceptorHeat-Shock ResponseHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansHydrogen PeroxideJurkat CellsMolecular ChaperonesNeoplasm ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Antineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsCamptothecinDactinomycinfas ReceptorHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSPB1 protein, humanHydrogen PeroxideMolecular ChaperonesNeoplasm ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Reactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID10447712
PMCPMC2326807
OpenAlexW2036472708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.