Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10441591›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1999

Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.

P C Abreu, D A Greenberg, S E Hodge

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GBS Mapping and Analysis of Genes Conserved betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Statistical Analysis in Genetic Studies of Mental Illnesses.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A recessive gene for primary vesicoureteral reflux maps to chromosome 12p11-q13.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P C AbreuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Columbia University, N.Y., USA.
D A Greenberg
S E Hodge

Funding

PSYCHIATRIC GENETICS AND FAMILY STUDIES--ROBUST METHODSR01MH048858 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HODGE, SUSAN E. · 1992 to 2010
$1.5M
LINKAGE AND SEGREGATION IN COMPLEX GENETIC DISEASESR01DK031813 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HODGE, SUSAN E. · 1986 to 2007
$835k
GENETIC STUDIES OF DEPRESSIVE DISORDERSR01MH028274 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WEISSMAN, MYRNA M · 1985 to 2003
$817k
GENETIC STUDIES OF DEPRESSIVE DISORDERSR37MH028274 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE · PI WEISSMAN, MYRNA M · 1990 to 2001
$244k
LINKAGE AND SEGREGATION IN COMPLEX GENETIC DISEASESR55DK031813 · NIDDK · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HODGE, SUSAN E. · 1991 to 1991
–
NIDDK NIH HHS DK-31813NIMH NIH HHS MH-28274NIMH NIH HHS MH-48858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several methods have been proposed for linkage analysis of complex traits with unknown mode of inheritance. These methods include the LOD score maximized over disease models (MMLS) and the "nonparametric" linkage (NPL) statistic. In previous work, we evaluated the increase of type I error when maximizing over two or more genetic models, and we compared the power of MMLS to detect linkage, in a number of complex modes of inheritance, with analysis assuming the true model. In the present study, we compare MMLS and NPL directly. We simulated 100 data sets with 20 families each, using 26 generating models: (1) 4 intermediate models (penetrance of heterozygote between that of the two homozygotes); (2) 6 two-locus additive models; and (3) 16 two-locus heterogeneity models (admixture alpha = 1.0,.7,.5, and.3; alpha = 1.0 replicates simple Mendelian models). For LOD scores, we assumed dominant and recessive inheritance with 50% penetrance. We took the higher of the two maximum LOD scores and subtracted 0.3 to correct for multiple tests (MMLS-C). We compared expected maximum LOD scores and power, using MMLS-C and NPL as well as the true model. Since NPL uses only the affected family members, we also performed an affecteds-only analysis using MMLS-C. The MMLS-C was both uniformly more powerful than NPL for most cases we examined, except when linkage information was low, and close to the results for the true model under locus heterogeneity. We still found better power for the MMLS-C compared with NPL in affecteds-only analysis. The results show that use of two simple modes of inheritance at a fixed penetrance can have more power than NPL when the trait mode of inheritance is complex and when there is heterogeneity in the data set.

Indexed as

Lod ScoreModels, GeneticStatistics, NonparametricGene FrequencyGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic LinkageGenotypeHumansLikelihood FunctionsPenetranceSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID10441591
PMCPMC1377991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.