Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10439927›Full record

ReviewDrugs1999

The rationale and future potential of angiogenesis inhibitors in neoplasia.

G Gasparini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Angiogenesis and its therapeutic opportunities.Mediators of inflammation · 2013
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G GaspariniDivision of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedali Riuniti Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy. oncologiarc@diel.it
Azienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant tumours are angiogenesis-dependent diseases. Several experimental studies suggest that primary tumour growth, invasiveness and metastasis require neovascularisation. Tumour-associated angiogenesis is a complex multistep process under the control of positive and negative soluble factors. A mutual stimulation occurs between tumour and endothelial cells by paracrine mechanisms. Angiogenesis is necessary, but not sufficient, as the single event for tumour growth. There is, however, compelling evidence that acquisition of the angiogenic phenotype is a common pathway for tumour progression, and that active angiogenesis is associated with other molecular mechanisms leading to tumour progression. Experimental research suggests that it is possible to block angiogenesis by specific inhibitory agents, and that modulation of angiogenic activity is associated with tumour regression in animals with different types of neoplasia. The more promising angiosuppressive agents for clinical testing are: naturally occurring inhibitors of angiogenesis (angiostatin, endostatin, platelet factor-4 and others), specific inhibitors of endothelial cell growth (TNP-470, thalidomide, interleukin-12 and others), agents neutralising angiogenic peptides (antibodies to fibroblast growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor, suramin and analogues, tecogalan and others) or their receptors, agents that interfere with vascular basement membrane and extracellular matrix [metalloprotease (MMP) inhibitors, angiostatic steroids and others], antiadhesion molecules antibodies such as antiintegrin alpha v beta 3, and miscellaneous drugs that modulate angiogenesis by diverse mechanisms of action. Antiangiogenic therapy is to be distinguished from vascular targeting. Gene therapy aimed to block neovascularisation is also a feasible anticancer strategy in animals bearing experimental tumours. Antiangiogenic therapy represents one of the more promising new approaches to anticancer therapy and it is already in early clinical trials. Because angiosuppressive therapy is aimed at blocking tumour growth indirectly, through modulation of neovascularisation, antiangiogenic agents need to be developed and evaluated as biological response modifiers. Therefore, adequate and well designed clinical trials should be performed for a proper evaluation of antiangiogenic agents, by determination and monitoring of surrogate markers of angiogenic activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID10439927
OpenAlexW2008438789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.