Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10432911›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health1999

A population comparison of participants and nonparticipants in a health survey.

R C Klesges, J E Williamson, G W Somes, G W Talcott, H A Lando, C K Haddock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beta-blocker use and risk of fractures in men and women from the general population: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2007
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R C KlesgesUniversity of Memphis, Tenn., USA. bklesges@cc.memphis.edu
J E Williamson
G W Somes
G W Talcott
H A Lando
C K Haddock

Funding

POPULATION WIDE SMOKING CESSATION/PREVENTION PROGRAMR18HL053478 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2012
$5.1M
POPULATION WIDE SMOKING CESSATION/PREVENTION PROGRAMR01HL053478 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 1995 to 1997
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-53478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the characteristics of Air Force recruits willing to take part in a health survey vs those unwilling to participate.

methodsUS Air Force recruits undergoing basic military training (n = 32,144) were surveyed regarding demographic and health variables.

resultsRespondents indicating an unwillingness to participate in a health survey reported less healthy lifestyles than those willing to participate. Prediction equations modeling the characteristics of those engaging in 4 risky behaviors were nearly identical regardless of whether those refusing to participate were included.

conclusionsResults suggest that, despite some low estimates of health behaviors due to response bias, relationships between most risk factors are generally unaffected by those not responding to health surveys.

Indexed as

Health SurveysSelection BiasAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMilitary PersonnelRegression AnalysisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID10432911
PMCPMC1508706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.