ReviewGenetics1999
The archaeal molecular chaperone machine: peculiarities and paradoxes.
Review in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of heat- and chemically upregulated chaperone genes in plant and human cells.Cell stress & chaperones · 2011Pooled it
- Identification of HSP70 family and screening of drought resistance genes in sugar beet.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Ancestors in the Extreme: A Genomics View of Microbial Diversity in Hypersaline Aquatic Environments.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024Article
- Insights into archaeal chaperone machinery: a network-based approach.Cell stress & chaperones · 2018Article
- Multi-layered molecular mechanisms of polypeptide holding, unfolding and disaggregation by HSP70/HSP110 chaperones.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2015Review
- Functional analysis of archaeal MBF1 by complementation studies in yeast.Biology direct · 2011Article
- Awareness of hormesis will enhance future research in basic and applied neuroscience.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2008Article
- Evolution of a protein-folding machine: genomic and evolutionary analyses reveal three lineages of the archaeal hsp70(dnaK) gene.Journal of molecular evolution · 2006Article
- On the brotherhood of the mitochondrial chaperones mortalin and heat shock protein 60.Cell stress & chaperones · 2006Review
- Heat shock response of Archaeoglobus fulgidus.Journal of bacteriology · 2005Article
- Heat shock response by the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2003Article
- Comparative genomic analysis of archaeal genotypic variants in a single population and in two different oceanic provinces.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2002Article
- Archaeal adaptation to higher temperatures revealed by genomic sequence of Thermoplasma volcanium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major finding within the field of archaea and molecular chaperones has been the demonstration that, while some species have the stress (heat-shock) gene hsp70(dnaK), others do not. This gene encodes Hsp70(DnaK), an essential molecular chaperone in bacteria and eukaryotes. Due to the physiological importance and the high degree of conservation of this protein, its absence in archaeal organisms has raised intriguing questions pertaining to the evolution of the chaperone machine as a whole and that of its components in particular, namely, Hsp70(DnaK), Hsp40(DnaJ), and GrpE. Another archaeal paradox is that the proteins coded by these genes are very similar to bacterial homologs, as if the genes had been received via lateral transfer from bacteria, whereas the upstream flanking regions have no bacterial markers, but instead have typical archaeal promoters, which are like those of eukaryotes. Furthermore, the chaperonin system in all archaea studied to the present, including those that possess a bacterial-like chaperone machine, is similar to that of the eukaryotic-cell cytosol. Thus, two chaperoning systems that are designed to interact with a compatible partner, e.g., the bacterial chaperone machine physiologically interacts with the bacterial but not with the eucaryal chaperonins, coexist in archaeal cells in spite of their apparent functional incompatibility. It is difficult to understand how these hybrid characteristics of the archaeal chaperoning system became established and work, if one bears in mind the classical ideas learned from studying bacteria and eukaryotes. No doubt, archaea are intriguing organisms that offer an opportunity to find novel molecules and mechanisms that will, most likely, enhance our understanding of the stress response and the protein folding and refolding processes in the three phylogenetic domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.