Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10427469›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1999

Therapeutic drug concentration monitoring using saliva samples. Focus on anticonvulsants.

H Liu, M R Delgado

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Monitoring Salivary Concentrations of Tedizolid and Linezolid Using Rats.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unnecessary Investigations in Environmental Medicine.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H LiuDepartment of Research, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, USA. hua1@airmail.net
M R Delgado
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 30 years there has been great interest in the use of saliva in therapeutic drug monitoring. Numerous investigators have suggested that saliva be used as an alternative body fluid for the therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsant drugs. Not only can saliva be obtained easily on multiple occasions with minimal discomfort to the patient but, more importantly, useful relationships exist between the saliva and blood concentrations of the most commonly used anticonvulsant drugs. The measurement of anticonvulsant drug concentrations in saliva has been applied to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies, and for therapeutic drug monitoring in a variety of seizure disorders. However, this simple and non-invasive method is not widely accepted in clinical practice. Several recent developments in sample collection and analytical methods, and the growing interest in free drug concentrations, provide a renewed impetus for saliva sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsant drugs. Salivary flow rates vary significantly both between individuals and under different conditions. The use of stimulated saliva has several advantages over resting saliva. The salivary flow rate and pH, sampling conditions, contamination and many other pathophysiological factors may influence the concentrations of the medication in saliva. However, under standardised and well-controlled sampling condition, therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsant drugs in saliva can be useful for determining compliance with medication in paediatric patients, for analysing the concentration of free drug and in situations where repeated sampling is necessary. Saliva is an alternative matrix for the therapeutic drug monitoring of carbamazepine, phenytoin, primidone and ethosuximide because the concentrations of these medications in saliva reflect the concentrations of the drug in serum. This is not the case for valproic acid (valproate sodium) and some controversy exists for phenobarbital. Further studies are required to assess the clinical value of monitoring anticonvulsant drugs and their metabolites in saliva, to examine the influence of pathophysiological factors on salivary drug concentrations, to improve the design of special devices to reproducibly and conveniently collect saliva samples, and to develop and use new analytical methods to achieve more sensitive and accurate results.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAnticonvulsantsEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansSalivaAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID10427469
OpenAlexW959535830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.