Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10424810›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics1999

Applications of comparative genomic hybridisation in constitutional chromosome studies.

C J Breen, L Barton, A Carey, A Dunlop, M Glancy, K Hall, A M Hegarty, M T Khokhar, M Power, K Ryan and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Recurrent genomic imbalances in primary effusion lymphomas.Cancer genetics and cytogenetics · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C J BreenNational Centre for Medical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
L Barton
A Carey
A Dunlop
M Glancy
K Hall
A M Hegarty
M T Khokhar
M Power
K Ryan
A J Green
R L Stallings
Our Lady's Hospital · IEChildren's Health Ireland at Crumlin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G band cytogenetic analysis often leads to the discovery of unbalanced karyotypes that require further characterisation by molecular cytogenetic studies. In particular, G band analysis usually does not show the chromosomal origin of small marker chromosomes or of a small amount of extra material detected on otherwise normal chromosomes. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) is one of several molecular approaches that can be applied to ascertain the origin of extra chromosomal material. CGH is also capable of detecting loss of material and thus is also applicable to confirming or further characterising subtle deletions. We have used comparative genomic hybridisation to analyse 19 constitutional chromosome abnormalities detected by G band analysis, including seven deletions, five supernumerary marker chromosomes, two interstitial duplications, and five chromosomes presenting with abnormal terminal banding patterns. CGH was successful in elucidating the origin of extra chromosomal material in 10 out of 11 non-mosaic cases, and permitted further characterisation of all of the deletions that could be detected by GTG banding. CGH appears to be a useful adjunct tool for either confirming deletions or defining their breakpoints and for determining the origin of extra chromosomal material, even in cases where abnormalities are judged to be subtle. We discuss internal quality control measures, such as the mismatching of test and reference DNA in order to assess the quality of the competitive hybridisation effect on the X chromosome.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosome BandingChromosome MappingFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleNucleic Acid HybridizationSequence DeletionGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID10424810
PMCPMC1734415
OpenAlexW1962458808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.