Trial reportBritish journal of cancer1999
Oral topotecan: bioavailablity and effect of food co-administration.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-assembled ordered AuNRs-modified electrodes for simultaneous determination of dopamine and topotecan with improved data reproducibility.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Doxorubicin Formulation to Enhance Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Targeting.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Assessment of contribution of BCRP to intestinal absorption of various drugs using portal-systemic blood concentration difference model in mice.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
- Pharmacokinetics of metronomic chemotherapy: a neglected but crucial aspect.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
- Phase I and pharmacological study of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.British journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours and impaired renal function.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Resistance to cancer chemotherapy: failure in drug response from ADME to P-gp.Cancer cell international · 2015Article
- Combination metronomic oral topotecan and pazopanib: a pharmacokinetic study in patients with gynecological cancer.Anticancer research · 2013Article
- Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Review
- Toxicity of weekly oral topotecan in relation to dosage for gynecologic malignancies: a phase I study.Anti-cancer drugs · 2012Article
- Effects of food on the clinical pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents: underlying mechanisms and implications for oral chemotherapy.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2004Review
- Pharmacokinetic considerations of oral chemotherapy in elderly patients with cancer.Drugs & aging · 2002Review
- Oral topoisomerase 1 inhibitors in adult patients: present and future.Investigational new drugs · 1999Review
- Is Intravenous and Oral Topotecan in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Truly Equal? A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of the study were twofold: (1) to evaluate the effect of food on the relative oral bioavailability of topotecan gelatin capsules in patients with solid tumours, and (2) to determine the absolute bioavailability of oral topotecan with reference to the intravenous (i.v.) formulation. The study had a randomized two-period cross-over design. On day 1 of the first treatment course patients were administered 2.3 mg m(-2) day(-1) of oral topotecan with or without a high-fat breakfast. They crossed over to receive the alternate regimen on day 2. In the second course (3 weeks later) fasted patients received topotecan orally (2.3 mg m(-2) day(-1)) or i.v. (1.5 mg m(-3) day). They crossed over to receive the alternate regimen on day 2. On days 3-5 of both treatment courses patients received oral topotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 2 of the first and second course using a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study. The ratio of the area under the curve to infinity during fasted and high-fat treatment was 0.93+/-0.23 (90% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.03). Maximal plasma concentrations of topotecan were similar after ingestion of the capsules with (10.6+/-4.4 ng ml(-1)) or without food (9.2+/-4.1 ng ml(-1)) (P = 0.130). The time needed to reach maximal plasma levels was significantly prolonged after food intake (median 3.1 h, range 2.8-6.1) compared to fasted conditions (2.0 h, range 1.1-8.1) (P = 0.013). The absolute bioavailability of topotecan averaged 42+/-13% (90% CI 37-47%). The apparent terminal half-life was significantly longer after administration of oral topotecan (3.9+/-1.0 h) than after i.v. administration (2.7+/-0.4 h) (P < 0.001). Topotecan demonstrates suitable bioavailability for oral treatment. Co-administration of the topotecan gelatin capsules with a high-fat breakfast leads to a small decrease in absorption rate but does not affect the extent of absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.