Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10421381›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology1999

Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting.

M N Guilly, P Fouchet, P de Chamisso, A Schmitz, B Dutrillaux

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Chromosomal evolution in Rattini (Muridae, Rodentia).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  5. New insights into the karyotypic evolution in muroid rodents revealed by multicolor banding applying murine probes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Chromosomal phylogeny of four Akodontini species (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil established by Zoo-FISH using Mus musculus (Muridae) painting probes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  8. Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  9. Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  10. Comparative chromosome painting map between two Ryukyu spiny rat species, Tokudaia osimensis and Tokudaia tokunoshimensis (Muridae, Rodentia).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  11. Chromosome homology between mouse and three Muridae species, Millardia meltada, Acomys dimidiatus and Micromys minutus, and conserved chromosome segments in murid karyotypes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  12. Reciprocal chromosome painting between three laboratory rodent species.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2006
    Article
  13. Chromosome paints from single copies of chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2004
    Article
  14. Chromosome painting in the African four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment combinations.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  15. Highly conserved chromosomes in an Asian squirrel (Menetes berdmorei, Rodentia: Sciuridae) as demonstrated by ZOO-FISH with human probes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M N GuillyCEA, DSV-DRR, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France. mnguilly@armoise.saclay.cea.fr
P Fouchet
P de Chamisso
A Schmitz
B Dutrillaux
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRCEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative karyotype of rat (Rattus norvegicus) and mouse (Mus musculus) based on chromosome G-banding morphology, heterologous chromosome painting results and available gene mapping data is proposed. Whole chromosome painting probes from both species were generated by PARM-PCR amplification of flow sorted chromosomes. Bidirectional chromosome painting identifies 36 segments of syntenic homology and allows us to propose a nearly complete comparative karyotype of mouse and rat (except for RNO 13 p and RNO 19 p12-13). Seven segments completely covered the RNO chromosomes 3, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15 and 18. Eight segments completely covered the MMU chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 18 and 19. The RNO chromosomes 5, 8, 18 show complete homology with the MMU chromosomes 4, 9 and 18, respectively. Bidirectional hybridization results clearly assign 16 segments to subchromosomal regions in both species. Interpretation of the results allows subchromosomal assignment of all the remaining segments apart from seven distributed on chromosomes MMU 15, MMU 10 B2-D3 and MMU 17 E3-E5. The proposed comparative karyotype shows overall agreement with available comparative mapping data. The proposed repartition of syntenic homologous segments between the two species provides useful data for gene-mapping studies. In addition, these results will enable the reconstruction of the karyotype of the Cricetidae and Muridae common ancestor and the definition of the precise rearrangements which have occurred in both mouse and rat lineages during evolution.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionChromosome BandingChromosome PaintingDNA ProbesGenomeKaryotypingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPolymerase Chain ReactionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID10421381
OpenAlexW5224728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.