Equal antithrombotic and triglyceride-lowering effectiveness of eicosapentaenoic acid-rich and docosahexaenoic acid-rich fish oil supplements.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Dose-dependent effects of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on blood lipids in statin-treated hyperlipidaemic subjects.Lipids · 2007
   Trial
2. Differential Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Krill Meal, Soybean Meal, Butyrate, and BactocellInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
   Article
3. Fish oil and krill oil differentially modify the liver and brain lipidome when fed to mice.Lipids in health and disease · 2015
   Article
4. Krill oil versus fish oil in modulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism in mice transgenic for TNF-α.European journal of nutrition · 2013
   Article
5. Four new fatty acid esters from the Feces of Trogopterus xanthipes.Lipids · 2009
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as