Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10417295›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1999

Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.

D B Allison, M C Neale, R Zannolli, N J Schork, C I Amos, J Blangero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D B AllisonObesity Research Center, St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. dba8@columbia.edu
M C Neale
R Zannolli
N J Schork
C I Amos
J Blangero

Funding

RESEARCH TRAININGP30DK026687 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI Anthony W Ferrante, DYMPNA GALLAGHER · 1986 to 2026
$33.0M
QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS OF CLINICAL OBESITY RESEARCHR01DK051716 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI ALLISON, DAVID B · 1996 to 1999
–
GENETICS OF OBESITY AND RELATED RISKS AMONG BLACK WOMENR29DK047256 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI ALLISON, DAVID B · 1994 to 1998
–
NIDDK NIH HHS DK26687NIDDK NIH HHS DK47256NIDDK NIH HHS DK51716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of linkage to genes for quantitative traits remains a challenging task. Recently, variance components (VC) techniques have emerged as among the more powerful of available methods. As often implemented, such techniques require assumptions about the phenotypic distribution. Usually, multivariate normality is assumed. However, several factors may lead to markedly nonnormal phenotypic data, including (a) the presence of a major gene (not necessarily linked to the markers under study), (b) some types of gene x environment interaction, (c) use of a dichotomous phenotype (i.e., affected vs. unaffected), (d) nonnormality of the population within-genotype (residual) distribution, and (e) selective (extreme) sampling. Using simulation, we have investigated, for sib-pair studies, the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test for a VC quantitative-trait locus-detection procedure to violations of normality that are due to these factors. Results showed (a) that some types of nonnormality, such as leptokurtosis, produced type I error rates in excess of the nominal, or alpha, levels whereas others did not; and (b) that the degree of type I error-rate inflation appears to be directly related to the residual sibling correlation. Potential solutions to this problem are discussed. Investigators contemplating use of this VC procedure are encouraged to provide evidence that their trait data are normally distributed, to employ a procedure that allows for nonnormal data, or to consider implementation of permutation tests.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic LinkageLikelihood FunctionsQuantitative Trait, HeritableAnalysis of VarianceComputer SimulationHumansMatched-Pair AnalysisNuclear FamilyPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsSample SizeSoftwareStatistical Distributions

Identifiers

PMID10417295
PMCPMC1377951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.