Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10415076›Full record

Trial reportJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)1999

Impact of cytokine administration on the generation of antitumor reactivity in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving a peptide vaccine.

S A Rosenberg, J C Yang, D J Schwartzentruber, P Hwu, F M Marincola, S L Topalian, N P Restifo, M Sznol, S L Schwarz, P J Spiess and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Melanoma vaccines: mixed past, promising future.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. T-cell receptor affinity and avidity defines antitumor response and autoimmunity in T-cell immunotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical applications of a peptide-based vaccine for glioblastoma.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Adjuvants targeting innate and adaptive immunity synergize to enhance tumor immunotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

S A RosenbergSurgery Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. SAR@nih.gov
J C Yang
D J Schwartzentruber
P Hwu
F M Marincola
S L Topalian
N P Restifo
M Sznol
S L Schwarz
P J Spiess
J R Wunderlich
C A Seipp
J H Einhorn
L Rogers-Freezer
D E White
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZ01BC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS P · 2006 to 2008
$6.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010763Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with metastatic melanoma were immunized with an immunodominant peptide derived from the gp100 melanoma-melanocyte differentiation Ag that was modified to increase binding to HLA-A+0201. A total of 10 of 11 patients who received the g209-2M peptide alone developed precursors reactive with the native g209 peptide, compared with only 5 of 16 patients who received g209-2M peptide plus IL-2 (p2 = 0.005). Peptide reactivity closely correlated with the recognition of HLA-A+0201 melanoma cells (p < 0. 001). The decrease in immune reactivity when peptide was administered with IL-2 appeared specific for the immunizing peptide, since reactivity to an influenza peptide resulting from prior exposure was not affected. Preexisting antitumor precursors did not decrease when peptide plus IL-2 was administered. The administration of GM-CSF or IL-12 also resulted in a decrease in circulating precursors compared with the administration of peptide alone, though not as great a decrease as that seen with IL-2. Immunization with peptide plus IL-2 did, however, appear to have clinical impact since 6 of the 16 patients (38%) that received peptide plus IL-2 had objective cancer regressions. It thus appeared possible that immunization with peptide plus IL-2 resulted in sequestering or apoptotic destruction of newly activated immune cells at the tumor site. These represent the first detailed studies of the impact of immunization with tumor peptides in conjunction with a variety of cytokines in patients with metastatic cancer.

Indexed as

LipidsAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCancer VaccinesCell LineCytokinesFreund's Adjuvantgp100 Melanoma AntigenGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInfusions, IntravenousInjections, SubcutaneousInterleukin-12Lymphocyte ActivationMelanomaMembrane GlycoproteinsCancer VaccinesCytokinesFreund's Adjuvantg209-2M melanoma peptidegp100 Melanoma AntigenGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factorincomplete Freund's adjuvantInterleukin-12LipidsMembrane GlycoproteinsNeoplasm ProteinsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesPMEL protein, human

Identifiers

PMID10415076
PMCPMC2249693
OpenAlexW1936376546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.