Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10412088›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1999

A weakly coupled version of the Huxley crossbridge model can simulate energetics of amphibian and mammalian skeletal muscle.

C J Barclay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nitric oxide and skeletal muscle contractile function.Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2022
    Review
  3. A multiscale sliding filament model of lymphatic muscle pumping.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Components of activation heat in skeletal muscle.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanics and models of the myosin motor.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2000
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C J BarclayDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to establish whether quantitatively accurate predictions of the rate of crossbridge-dependent energy output from shortening muscle could be made on the basis of a 2-state model of crossbridge kinetics incorporating weak coupling between mechanical cycles and ATP hydrolysis. The model was based on Huxley's (1957) model but included rapid detachment, without ATP hydrolysis, of crossbridges when their strain energy increased sufficiently that crossbridge free energy exceeded that of the unbound state (Cooke et al., 1994). An expression was derived relating force to steady-state velocity in terms of the model's rate constants. The values of the rate constants that both provided the best fit through force-velocity data and correctly predicted crossbridge-dependent rate of energy output during an isometric contraction were found and used to predict the variation in rate of energy liberation with shortening velocity. The model predictions closely matched the estimated crossbridge energetics of frog sartorius muscle, including the decline in rate of enthalpy output at high shortening velocities. Data from fast- and slow-twitch muscles of the mouse were also simulated. The velocity-dependence of rate of energy liberation from fast-twitch EDL muscle was well described by the model. The model overestimated crossbridge-dependent energy output from slow-twitch soleus at low shortening velocities but provided accurate predictions of energy output at high velocities. In terms of this model, the distinctive energetics of fast and slow muscles cannot be explained exclusively by differences in cross-bridge detachment rate; differences in the relative rates of crossbridge attachment must also be considered to explain the different relations between energy output and shortening velocity.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsKineticsMiceMuscle ContractionMuscle Fibers, Fast-TwitchMuscle Fibers, Slow-TwitchMuscle, SkeletalRana temporariaThermodynamics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.