Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10409752›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1999

Flanking regulatory sequences of the Tetrahymena R deletion element determine the boundaries of DNA rearrangement.

D L Chalker, A La Terza, A Wilson, C D Kroenke, M C Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Programmed genome rearrangements in ciliates.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D L ChalkerDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. dchalker@fred.fhcrc.org
A La Terza
A Wilson
C D Kroenke
M C Yao

Funding

GENE AMPLIFICATION AND ELIMINATION IN TETRAHYMENAR01GM026210 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, MENG-CHAO H · 1985 to 2006
$4.0M
DEVELOPMENTALLY PROGRAMMED DNA DELETION IN TETRAHYMENAF32GM016315 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CHALKER, DOUGLAS LEE · 1993 to 1995
–
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM016315NIGMS NIH HHS GM16315NIGMS NIH HHS GM26210NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, thousands of DNA segments of variable size are eliminated from the developing somatic macronucleus by specific DNA rearrangements. It is unclear whether rearrangement of the many different DNA elements occurs via a single mechanism or via multiple rearrangement systems. In this study, we characterized in vivo cis-acting sequences required for the rearrangement of the 1.1-kbp R deletion element. We found that rearrangement requires specific sequences flanking each side of the deletion element. The required sequences on the left side appear to span roughly a 70-bp region that is located at least 30 bp from the rearrangement boundary. When we moved the location of the left cis-acting sequences closer to the eliminated region, we observed a rightward shift of the rearrangement boundary such that the newly formed deletion junction retained its original distance from this flanking region. Likewise, when we moved the flanking region as much as 500 bp away from the deletion element, the rearrangement boundary shifted to remain in relative juxtaposition. Clusters of base substitutions made throughout this critical flanking region did not affect rearrangement efficiency or accuracy, which suggests a complex nature for this regulatory sequence. We also found that the right flanking region effectively replaced the essential sequences identified on the left side, and thus, the two flanking regions contain sequences of analogous function despite the lack of obvious sequence identity. These data taken together indicate that the R-element flanking regions contain sequences that position the rearrangement boundaries from a short distance away. Previously, a 10-bp polypurine tract flanking the M-deletion element was demonstrated to act from a distance to determine its rearrangement boundaries. No apparent sequence similarity exists between the M and R elements. The functional similarity between these different cis-acting sequences of the two elements is firm support for a common mechanism controlling Tetrahymena rearrangement.

Indexed as

Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsCell NucleusDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RecombinantSequence DeletionTetrahymena thermophilaTransformation, GeneticDNA, ProtozoanDNA, Recombinant

Identifiers

PMID10409752
PMCPMC84415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.