ArticleBritish journal of cancer1999
Chromosomal gains and losses in primary colorectal carcinomas detected by CGH and their associations with tumour DNA ploidy, genotypes and phenotypes.
Article in British journal of cancer, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.
- Copy number alterations and allelic ratio in relation to recurrence of rectal cancer.BMC genomics · 2015Pooled it
- Chromosomal copy number alterations are associated with tumor response to chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2011Trial
- Methylation of three genes encoded by X chromosome in blood leukocytes and colorectal cancer risk.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- CHST7 Gene Methylation and Sex-Specific Effects on Colorectal Cancer Risk.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer and its association with genomic alterations.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Article
- A temporal shift of the evolutionary principle shaping intratumor heterogeneity in colorectal cancer.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Transkingdom network reveals bacterial players associated with cervical cancer gene expression program.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Article
- Unsupervised Analysis of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Data from Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Reveals Equivalence with Molecular Classification and Phenotypes.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Over-expression of AURKA, SKA3 and DSN1 contributes to colorectal adenoma to carcinoma progression.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Article
- TP53/p53 alterations and Aurora A expression in progressor and non-progressor colectomies from patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis.International journal of molecular medicine · 2015Article
- Interplay between promoter methylation and chromosomal loss in gene silencing at 3p11-p14 in cervical cancer.Epigenetics · 2015Article
- Gender-associated genomic differences in colorectal cancer: clinical insight from feminization of male cancer cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
- Telomere shortening correlates to dysplasia but not to DNA aneuploidy in longstanding ulcerative colitis.BMC gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Mechanisms of topoisomerase I (TOP1) gene copy number increase in a stage III colorectal cancer patient cohort.PloS one · 2013Article
- CSE1L, DIDO1 and RBM39 in colorectal adenoma to carcinoma progression.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2012Article
- A genome-wide study of cytogenetic changes in colorectal cancer using SNP microarrays: opportunities for future personalized treatment.PloS one · 2012Article
- Genetics, cytogenetics, and epigenetics of colorectal cancer.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011Review
- Mapping of genetic abnormalities of primary tumours from metastatic CRC by high-resolution SNP arrays.PloS one · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is used to detect amplified and/or deleted chromosomal regions in tumours by mapping their locations on normal metaphase chromosomes. Forty-five sporadic colorectal carcinomas were screened for chromosomal aberrations using direct CGH. The median number of chromosomal aberrations per tumour was 7.0 (range 0-19). Gains of 20q (67%) and losses of 18q (49%) were the most frequent aberrations. Other recurrent gains of 5p, 6p, 7, 8q, 13q, 17q, 19, X and losses of 1p, 3p, 4, 5q. 6q, 8p, 9p, 10, 15q, 17p were found in > 10% of colorectal tumours. High-level gains (ratio > 1.5) were seen only on 8q, 13q, 20 and X, and only in DNA aneuploid tumours. DNA aneuploid tumours had significantly more chromosomal aberrations (median number per tumour of 9.0) compared to diploid tumours (median of 1.0) (P < 0.0001). The median numbers of aberrations seen in DNA hyperdiploid and highly aneuploid tumours were not significantly different (8.5 and 11.0 respectively; P = 0.58). Four tumours had no detectable chromosomal aberrations and these were DNA diploid. A higher percentage of tumours from male patients showed Xq gain and 18q loss compared to tumours from female patients (P = 0.05 and 0.01 respectively). High tumour S phase fractions were associated with gain of 20q13 (P = 0.03), and low tumour apoptotic indices were associated with loss of 4q (P = 0.05). Tumours with TP53 mutations had more aberrations (median of 9.0 per tumour) compared to those without (median of 2.0) (P = 0.002), and gain of 8q23-24 and loss of 18qcen-21 were significantly associated with TP53 mutations (P = 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). Dukes' C/D stage tumours tended to have a higher number of aberrations per tumour (median of 10.0) compared to Dukes' B tumours (median of 3.0) (P = 0.06). The low number of aberrations observed in DNA diploid tumours compared to aneuploid tumours suggests that genomic instability and possible growth advantages in diploid tumours do not result from acquisition of gross chromosomal aberrations but rather from selection for other types of mutations. Our study is consistent with the idea that these two groups of tumours evolve along separate genetic pathways and that gross genomic instability is associated with TP53 gene aberrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.