Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10408863›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1999

Chromosomal gains and losses in primary colorectal carcinomas detected by CGH and their associations with tumour DNA ploidy, genotypes and phenotypes.

P M De Angelis, O P Clausen, A Schjølberg, T Stokke

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CSE1L, DIDO1 and RBM39 in colorectal adenoma to carcinoma progression.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetics, cytogenetics, and epigenetics of colorectal cancer.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P M De AngelisInstitute of Pathology, The Norwegian National Hospital, Oslo.
O P Clausen
A Schjølberg
T Stokke
University of Oslo · NONorwegian Cancer Society · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is used to detect amplified and/or deleted chromosomal regions in tumours by mapping their locations on normal metaphase chromosomes. Forty-five sporadic colorectal carcinomas were screened for chromosomal aberrations using direct CGH. The median number of chromosomal aberrations per tumour was 7.0 (range 0-19). Gains of 20q (67%) and losses of 18q (49%) were the most frequent aberrations. Other recurrent gains of 5p, 6p, 7, 8q, 13q, 17q, 19, X and losses of 1p, 3p, 4, 5q. 6q, 8p, 9p, 10, 15q, 17p were found in > 10% of colorectal tumours. High-level gains (ratio > 1.5) were seen only on 8q, 13q, 20 and X, and only in DNA aneuploid tumours. DNA aneuploid tumours had significantly more chromosomal aberrations (median number per tumour of 9.0) compared to diploid tumours (median of 1.0) (P < 0.0001). The median numbers of aberrations seen in DNA hyperdiploid and highly aneuploid tumours were not significantly different (8.5 and 11.0 respectively; P = 0.58). Four tumours had no detectable chromosomal aberrations and these were DNA diploid. A higher percentage of tumours from male patients showed Xq gain and 18q loss compared to tumours from female patients (P = 0.05 and 0.01 respectively). High tumour S phase fractions were associated with gain of 20q13 (P = 0.03), and low tumour apoptotic indices were associated with loss of 4q (P = 0.05). Tumours with TP53 mutations had more aberrations (median of 9.0 per tumour) compared to those without (median of 2.0) (P = 0.002), and gain of 8q23-24 and loss of 18qcen-21 were significantly associated with TP53 mutations (P = 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). Dukes' C/D stage tumours tended to have a higher number of aberrations per tumour (median of 10.0) compared to Dukes' B tumours (median of 3.0) (P = 0.06). The low number of aberrations observed in DNA diploid tumours compared to aneuploid tumours suggests that genomic instability and possible growth advantages in diploid tumours do not result from acquisition of gross chromosomal aberrations but rather from selection for other types of mutations. Our study is consistent with the idea that these two groups of tumours evolve along separate genetic pathways and that gross genomic instability is associated with TP53 gene aberrations.

Indexed as

AneuploidyChromosome AberrationsGene DeletionColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGene AmplificationGenotypeHumansMaleNucleic Acid HybridizationPhenotypeDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID10408863
PMCPMC2362312
OpenAlexW1969195196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.