ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry1999
Cardiac myofibrillar proteins: biochemical markers to estimate myocardial injury.
Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The roles of traditional chinese medicine: shen-fu injection on the postresuscitation care bundle.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013Review
- The effect of high dose melatonin on cardiac ischemia- reperfusion Injury.Yonsei medical journal · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischaemic heart disease represents the most common of the serious health problems in the contemporary society and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and death. The accurate localization and determination of the infarct size and the volume of myocardium at risk at the time of insult is crucial and vital for the choice of treatment. Initially the ischaemic cells are reversibly injured. However, if these changes are not reverted at the earliest, it results in the death of the myocyte. This irreversible myocyte necrosis travels transmurally towards epicardium in the form of a wavefront. A timely intervention during evolving infarct could reduce and delimit the infarct and preserve the left ventricular function. Enzyme analysis and electrocardiography (ECG) along with the clinical history of the patient is still considered to constitute a reliable triad in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Efforts have been made to relate infarct size with the serum enzyme level changes without much success. In addition, a number of specialist techniques such as planar radioisotope imaging, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), Echocardiography, Ventriculography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging have been devised to support diagnosis in the patients who show ambiguous symptoms and ECG findings. However most of these procedures are unavailable to the patients due to economic reasons while others have suffered due to non-availability of ideal radiopharmaceuticals. Major advances have been made in the methods based on immunological techniques to improve the detection and estimation of infarct. These methods are exclusively based upon the production and availability of specific antibodies against intracellular, cardiac specific components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.