Managing acute anaphylaxis. New guidelines emphasise importance of intramuscular adrenaline.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. A systematic review of the utility of electrodiagnostic testing in carpal tunnel syndrome.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
   Pooled it
2. Clinical characteristics and management of iodine contrast media-related anaphylactic shock during cardiac catheterization.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020
   Article
3. Management of acute adverse reactions to contrast media.European radiology · 2004
   Article
4. [Out-of-Hospital treatment of anaphylactoid reactions].Der Internist · 2004
   Review
5. Using pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in the treatment of psychiatric disorders: some ethical and economic considerations.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2004
   Review
6. The role of epinephrine in the treatment of anaphylaxis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2003
   Review
7. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres.British journal of cancer · 2001
   Article
8. Managing acute anaphylaxis. Intravenous adrenaline should be considered because of the urgency of the condition.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Managing acute anaphylaxis. Intravenous adrenaline should be considered because of the urgency of the condition.2000
• Commented on by
  Speed of treatment affects outcome in anaphylaxis.2000
• Commented on by
  Adrenaline and non-life threatening allergic reactions: Intramuscular adrenaline is safe.2003

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as