Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10390232›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1999

Comparative efficacies of liposomal amikacin (MiKasome) plus oxacillin versus conventional amikacin plus oxacillin in experimental endocarditis induced by Staphylococcus aureus: microbiological and echocardiographic analyses.

Y Q Xiong, L I Kupferwasser, P M Zack, A S Bayer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Amikacin: Uses, Resistance, and Prospects for Inhibition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y Q XiongSt. John's Cardiovascular Research Center, LAC-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California 90509, USA. xiong@humc.edu
L I Kupferwasser
P M Zack
A S Bayer
UCLA Medical Center · USNivalis Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal treatment strategies for serious infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus have not been fully characterized. The combination of a beta-lactam plus an aminoglycoside can act synergistically against S. aureus in vitro and in vivo. MiKasome, a new liposome-encapsulated formulation of conventional amikacin, significantly prolongs serum half-life (t1/2) and increases the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) compared to free amikacin. Microbiologic efficacy and left ventricular function, as assessed by echocardiography, were compared in animals administered either oxacillin alone or oxacillin in combination with conventional amikacin or MiKasome in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis due to S. aureus. In vitro, oxacillin, combined with either free amikacin or MiKasome, prevented the bacterial regrowth observed with aminoglycosides alone at 24 h of incubation. Rabbits with S. aureus endocarditis were treated with either oxacillin alone (50 mg/kg, given intramuscularly three times daily), oxacillin plus daily amikacin (27 mg/kg, given intravenously twice daily), or oxacillin plus intermittent MiKasome (160 mg/kg, given intravenously, a single dose on days 1 and 4). The oxacillin-alone dosage represents a subtherapeutic regimen against the infecting strain in the endocarditis model (L. Hirano and A. S. Bayer, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:685-690, 1991), thus allowing recognition of any enhanced bactericidal effects between oxacillin and either aminoglycoside formulation. Treatment was administered for either 3 or 6 days, and animals were sacrificed after each of these time points or at 5 days after a 6-day treatment course (to evaluate for posttherapy relapse). Left ventricular function was analyzed by utilizing serial transthoracic echocardiography during treatment and posttherapy by measurement of left ventricular fractional shortening. At all sacrifice times, both combination regimens significantly reduced S. aureus vegetation counts versus control counts (P < 0.05). In contrast, oxacillin alone did not significantly reduce S. aureus vegetation counts after 3 days of therapy. Furthermore, at this time point, the two combinations were significantly more effective than oxacillin alone (P < 0.05). All three regimens were effective in significantly decreasing bacterial counts in the myocardium during and after therapy compared to controls (P < 0.05). In kidney and spleen abscesses, all regimens significantly reduced bacterial counts during therapy (P < 0.0001); however, only the combination regimens prevented bacteriologic relapse in these organs posttherapy. By echocardiographic analysis, both combination regimens yielded a significant physiological benefit by maintaining normal left ventricular function during treatment and posttherapy compared with oxacillin alone (P < 0.001). These results suggest that the use of intermittent MiKasome (similar to daily conventional amikacin) enhances the in vivo bactericidal effects of oxacillin in a severe S. aureus infection model and preserves selected physiological functions in target end organs.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyAmikacinAnimalsDrug CarriersDrug Therapy, CombinationEndocarditis, BacterialFemaleLiposomesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxacillinRabbitsStaphylococcal InfectionsSurvival RateVentricular Function, LeftAmikacinDrug CarriersLiposomesOxacillin

Identifiers

PMID10390232
PMCPMC89353
OpenAlexW2115240141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.