Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10390141›Full record

ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis1999

Mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis and therapeutic implications: angiogenesis inhibitors.

H Malonne, I Langer, R Kiss, G Atassi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomarkers in preclinical cancer imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Angiogenesis-dependent diseases and angiogenesis therapy.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2001
    Review
  11. Angiogenesis as a target for breast cancer therapy.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 1999
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H MalonneLaboratoire de Pharmacologie, Institut de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. hmalone@ulb.ac.be
I Langer
R Kiss
G Atassi
Association Pharmaceutique Belge · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is the development of new blood vessels from the existing vascular bed. In normal conditions this tightly regulated process occurs only during embryonic development, the female reproductive cycle and wound repair. In contrast, in pathological conditions such as malignant growth, atherosclerosis and diabetic retinopathy, angiogenesis becomes persistent due to an imbalance in the interplay between the positive and negative regulatory signals controlling the process. Thus, the control of tumor neovascularization may lead to new therapeutic approaches. Indeed, several anti-angiogenic drugs are currently undergoing preclinical characterization and/or clinical investigation. Recent achievement has clarified the mechanisms of action leading to pathological angiogenesis and has highlighted the role of hypoxia, growth factors, growth factor-receptors, enzymes and cell adhesion molecules involved in the process. This knowledge has permitted the design of receptor antagonists, adhesion molecule blockers and new targeted vascular approaches including gene therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Adhesion MoleculesHumansNeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalNeovascularization, PathologicSignal TransductionCell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID10390141
OpenAlexW1579703324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.