Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10388833›Full record

ArticleGenetics1999

Genome mapping in capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the solanaceae.

K D Livingstone, V K Lackney, J R Blauth, R van Wijk, M K Jahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Chromosome Evolution in the Family Solanaceae.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Overview of Biotic Stresses in Pepper (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nucleotide sequence polymorphism in theJournal of genetics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K D LivingstoneDepartment of Plant Breeding, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
V K Lackney
J R Blauth
R van Wijk
M K Jahn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have created a genetic map of Capsicum (pepper) from an interspecific F2 population consisting of 11 large (76.2-192.3 cM) and 2 small (19.1 and 12.5 cM) linkage groups that cover a total of 1245.7 cM. Many of the markers are tomato probes that were chosen to cover the tomato genome, allowing comparison of this pepper map to the genetic map of tomato. Hybridization of all tomato-derived probes included in this study to positions throughout the pepper map suggests that no major losses have occurred during the divergence of these genomes. Comparison of the pepper and tomato genetic maps showed that 18 homeologous linkage blocks cover 98.1% of the tomato genome and 95.0% of the pepper genome. Through these maps and the potato map, we determined the number and types of rearrangements that differentiate these species and reconstructed a hypothetical progenitor genome. We conclude there have been 30 breaks as part of 5 translocations, 10 paracentric inversions, 2 pericentric inversions, and 4 disassociations or associations of genomic regions that differentiate tomato, potato, and pepper, as well as an additional reciprocal translocation, nonreciprocal translocation, and a duplication or deletion that differentiate the two pepper mapping parents.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome, PlantPlants, MedicinalCapsicumGenetic MarkersGenotypeModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSolanaceaeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID10388833
PMCPMC1460652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.