Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10385365›Full record

ArticleSurgery today1999

Co-expression of E-cadherin and alpha-catenin molecules in colorectal cancer.

T Kitagawa, K Matsumoto, A Nagafuchi, S Tsukita, H Suzuki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, Yokkaichi Social Insurance Hospital, Japan.
K Matsumoto
A Nagafuchi
S Tsukita
H Suzuki
Kyoto University · JPYokkaichi Social Insurance Hospital · JPMie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemical staining for epithelial (E)-cadherin and alpha-catenin was performed using frozen sections taken from fresh operative specimens, by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Tumors were classified into three types according to the expression modality. Cancer cells with expression at the cell-cell boundaries were defined as normal; when the expression was positive, but not concentrated at the cell-cell boundaries, they were defined as cytoplasmic; and when the tumor showed no staining, they were defined as lost. The relationship between these three expression types and the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer was investigated. In all 50 normal mucosa samples, E-cadherin and alpha-catenin were coexpressed normally. The expression type of E-cadherin and alpha-catenin was normal in 11 and 13 of the cancer tissue specimens, respectively, cytoplasmic in 26 and 29, respectively, and lost in 13 and 8, respectively. Cytoplasmic or lost expression was observed in cancer demonstrating an advanced clinical stage (E-cadherin, P = 0.0065; alpha-catenin, P = 0.0069), advanced tumor penetration (P = 0.0003, P = 0.0001), undifferentiated tumor histology (P = 0.0196, P = 0.0343), widespread lymph node involvement (P = 0.0204, P = 0.0340), and liver metastasis (P = 0.0063, P = 0.0299). In conclusion, the expression type of E-cadherin is significantly correlated to that of alpha-catenin, and the loss of their expression indicates the metastatic potentiality of colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overalpha CateninCadherinsColorectal NeoplasmsCytoplasmCytoskeletal ProteinsFemaleHistocytochemistryHumansIntestinal MucosaLiver NeoplasmsLymph NodesMaleMiddle Agedalpha CateninCadherinsCTNNA1 protein, humanCytoskeletal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10385365
OpenAlexW2066223074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.