Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10384860›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1999

The efficiency concept in pharmacodynamics.

G Alván, G Paintaud, M Wakelkamp

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Predicting brain occupancy from plasma levels using PET: superiority of combining pharmacokinetics with pharmacodynamics while modeling the relationship.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2012
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Calculating occupancy when one does not have baseline: a comparison of different options.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G AlvánKarolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden. gunnar.alvan@labtek.ki.se
G Paintaud
M Wakelkamp
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classic approach to describe the pharmacological response to a drug is to analyse its concentration-effect relationship, using a variety of possible models such as maximum effect (Emax) models or sigmoid Emax models. The aim of this review is to discuss an alternative way of describing the pharmacological effect in terms of effect per unit of drug concentration, instead of simple effect. This variable is called efficiency, analogous with concepts used in other fields. The pharmacodynamic model for efficiency is derived from the sigmoid Emax model and is dependent on the same parameters. Since the sigmoid Emax model incorporates 'the law of diminishing returns', requiring ever higher concentrations to increase the effect by a given percentage, efficiency is bound to decrease with increasing concentrations. However, as a mathematical consequence of its derivation from the sigmoid Emax model, efficiency also has a maximum value, which can be expressed as a function of the slope factor (s) and drug concentration associated with half the maximum effect (C50), provided that the slope factor is greater than 1. The efficiency concept is potentially applicable to all drugs and particularly useful for those that follow concentration-effect relationships according to Emax or sigmoid Emax models. Most experience has been obtained with loop diuretics, especially with furosemide (frusemide). Slow administration of furosemide, leading to slow excretion of the drug, has been shown, in many studies, to significantly increase the total diuretic effect per amount of drug recovered in urine. In this review, some examples of the applicability of the efficiency concept to other drugs, such as antibacterials, opioids and antineoplastics, are discussed. In addition to pharmacodynamically varying efficiency, other saturable processes, such as the formation of active metabolites and saturable transport, may form a basis for the application of the efficiency concept. The efficiency of a drug dosage may also be influenced by tolerance and counter-regulation produced by the drug. All these factors contribute to schedule dependency. It is concluded that the shape of the time course of drug presentation to its site of action is an independent determinant of overall response. The possibility of adjusting the drug input profile to maximise therapeutic effect per dose and to separate cumulated therapeutic from cumulated adverse effects should be considered in designing administration schedules and in drug development.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPharmacologyBiological AvailabilityDiureticsFurosemideHumansTreatment OutcomeDiureticsFurosemide

Identifiers

PMID10384860
OpenAlexW2108962072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.