Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10378700›Full record

ReviewOncogene1999

Transformation by v-Myb.

J S Lipsick, D M Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transcription Factor MYB as Therapeutic Target: Current Developments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Association between B-Oncology letters · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Animal-specific C-terminal domain links myeloblastosis oncoprotein (Myb) to an ancient repressor complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  20. The early history of tumor virology: Rous, RIF, and RAV.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J S LipsickDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5324, USA.
D M Wang
Stanford University · US

Funding

TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009151 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLEARY, MICHAEL L · 1985 to 2014
$5.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The v-myb oncogene of the avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) is unique among known oncogenes in that it causes only acute leukemia in animals and transforms only hematopoietic cells in culture. AMV was discovered in the 1930s as a virus that caused a disease in chickens that is similar to acute myelogenous leukemia in humans (Hall et al., 1941). This avian retrovirus played an important role in the history of cancer research for two reasons. First, AMV was used to demonstrate that all oncogenic viruses did not contain a single cancer-causing principle. In particular, although both Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) and AMV could replicate in cultures of either embryonic fibroblasts or hematopoietic cells, RSV could transform only fibroblasts whereas AMV could transform only hematopoietic cells (Baluda, 1963; Durban and Boettiger, 1981a). Second, chickens infected with AMV develop remarkably high white counts and therefore their peripheral blood contains remarkably large quantities of viral particles (Beard, 1963). For this reason AMV was often used as a prototypic retrovirus in order to study viral assembly and later to produce large amounts of reverse transcriptase for both research and commercial purposes. Following the discovery of the v-src oncogene of RSV and the demonstration that it arose from the normal c-src proto-oncogene, a number of acute leukemia viruses were analysed by similar techniques and found to also contain viral oncogenes of cellular origin (Roussel et al., 1979). In the case of AMV, it was shown that almost the entire retroviral env gene had been replaced by a sequence of cellular origin (initially called mab or amv, but later renamed v-myb) (Duesberg et al., 1980; Souza et al., 1980). Remarkably, sequences contained in this myb oncogene were shared between AMV and the avian E26 leukemia virus, but were not contained in any other acutely transforming retroviruses. In addition, the E26 virus contained a second sequence of cellular origin (ets) that was unique. The E26 leukemia virus was first described in the 1960s and causes an acute erythroblastosis in chickens, more reminiscent of the disease caused by avian erythroblastosis virus (AEV) than by AMV (Ivanov et al., 1962).

Indexed as

AnimalsAvian Myeloblastosis VirusCell Transformation, NeoplasticHumansOncogene Proteins v-mybProto-Oncogene MasRetroviridae Proteins, OncogenicMAS1 protein, humanOncogene Proteins v-mybProto-Oncogene MasRetroviridae Proteins, Oncogenic

Identifiers

PMID10378700
OpenAlexW2313609969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.