Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10378696›Full record

ReviewOncogene1999

MYC oncogenes and human neoplastic disease.

C E Nesbit, J M Tersak, E V Prochownik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 536 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
536citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

536 citing papers in PubMed, 1,166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sequence-Directed Transcriptional Silencing Using Gamma Peptide Nucleic Acids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CAP superfamily proteins in human: a new target for cancer therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

476 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C E NesbitDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
J M Tersak
E V Prochownik
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF HEMATOPOIETIC DIFFERENTIATIONR01HL033741 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PROCHOWNIK, EDWARD V · 1985 to 2000
$341k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL33741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

c-myc, N-myc and L-myc are the three members of the myc oncoprotein family whose role in the pathogenesis of many human neoplastic diseases has received wide empirical support. In this review, we first summarize data, derived mainly from non-clinical studies, indicating that these oncoproteins actually serve quite different roles in vivo. This concept necessarily lies at the heart of the basis for the observation that the deregulated expression of each MYC gene is reproducibly associated with only certain naturally occurring malignancies in humans and that these genes are not interchangeable with respect to their aberrant functional consequences. We also review evidence implicating each of the above MYC genes in specific neoplastic diseases and have attempted to identify unresolved questions which deserve further basic or clinical investigation. We have made every attempt to review those diseases for which significant and confirmatory evidence, based on studies with primary tumor material, exists to implicate MYC members in their causation and/or progression.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA, NeoplasmGenes, mycHumansNeoplasmsTranscriptional ActivationDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID10378696
OpenAlexW2064772366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.