Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10377369›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience1999

Spatial attention deficits in patients with acquired or developmental cerebellar abnormality.

J Townsend, E Courchesne, J Covington, M Westerfield, N S Harris, P Lyden, T P Lowry, G A Press

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J TownsendDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0217, USA.
E Courchesne
J Covington
M Westerfield
N S Harris
P Lyden
T P Lowry
G A Press

Funding

INVESTIGATON OF COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION IN AUTISMR01MH036840 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI COURCHESNE, ERIC · 1985 to 2011
$5.9M
DYNAMIC CONTROL OF SPATIAL ATTENTION--NEUROLOGIC BASESR01NS034155 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI TOWNSEND, JEANNE · 1996 to 1998
–
NIMH NIH HHS 2RO1-MH36840-11NINDS NIH HHS 1RO1-NS34155-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent imaging and clinical studies have challenged the concept that the functional role of the cerebellum is exclusively in the motor domain. We present evidence of slowed covert orienting of visuospatial attention in patients with developmental cerebellar abnormality (patients with autism, a disorder in which at least 90% of all postmortem cases reported to date have Purkinje neuron loss), and in patients with cerebellar damage acquired from tumor or stroke. In spatial cuing tasks, normal control subjects across a wide age range were able to orient attention within 100 msec of an attention-directing cue. Patients with cerebellar damage showed little evidence of having oriented attention after 100 msec but did show the effects of attention orienting after 800-1200 msec. These effects were demonstrated in a task in which results were independent of the motor response. In this task, smaller cerebellar vermal lobules VI-VII (from magnetic resonance imaging) were associated with greater attention-orienting deficits. Although eye movements may also be disrupted in patients with cerebellar damage, abnormal gaze shifting cannot explain the timing and nature of the attention-orienting deficits reported here. These data may be consistent with evidence from animal models that suggest damage to the cerebellum disrupts both the spatial encoding of a location for an attentional shift and the subsequent gaze shift. These data are also consistent with a model of cerebellar function in which the cerebellum supports a broad spectrum of brain systems involved in both nonmotor and motor function.

Indexed as

AttentionSpace PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAutistic DisorderCerebellar NeoplasmsCerebellumCerebrovascular DisordersCuesDiscrimination LearningEye MovementsHumansIntelligence TestsMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID10377369
PMCPMC6782343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.