ArticleInfection and immunity1999
Pathogenesis of gram-positive bacterial endophthalmitis.
Article in Infection and immunity, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogen-Associated Visual Outcomes Following Postprocedure Endophthalmitis.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Proteomic profiling reveals immunomodulatory role of IL-33 in ocular bacterial and fungal infections.Infection and immunity · 2025Article
- Contribution of Leukocidin ED to the Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- Novel Anti-Microbial/Anti-Inflammatory Combination Improves Clinical Outcome of Bacillus cereus Endophthalmitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Endophthalmitis Caused byAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Role of CCL Chemokines in Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Oral administration of S-nitroso-L-glutathione (GSNO) provides anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects during ocular bacterial infections.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Therapeutic potential ofmSphere · 2023Article
- OculusGraphy: Signal Analysis of the Electroretinogram in a Rabbit Model of Endophthalmitis Using Discrete and Continuous Wavelet Transforms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Virulence-related genotypic differences amongFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Roles of CCL2 and CCL3 in intraocular inflammation during Bacillus endophthalmitis.Experimental eye research · 2022Article
- Transcriptomics and systems biology identify non-antibiotic drugs for the treatment of ocular bacterial infection.iScience · 2022Article
- Article
- Endophthalmitis: Changes in Presentation, Management and the Role of Early Vitrectomy.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2021Review
- C-X-C Chemokines Influence Intraocular Inflammation During Bacillus Endophthalmitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Immune Inhibitor A Metalloproteases Contribute to Virulence inInfection and immunity · 2021Article
- Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Triggers Differential Inflammatory Response in Patients With Endophthalmitis.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- TheMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2021Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The severity of endophthalmitis has been associated generally with the virulence of the offending pathogen. However, precisely what constitutes the virulence in intraocular infections remains ill defined. We therefore sought to identify the basis for virulence for three common ocular pathogens (Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus aureus) in terms of intraocular growth rates, bacterial localization patterns, and the contribution of cell walls and secreted products to the pathogenesis of endophthalmitis. Rabbit eyes were injected intravitreally with (i) viable B. cereus, E. faecalis, or S. aureus, (ii) metabolically inactive B. cereus, E. faecalis, or S. aureus, (iii) sacculus preparations from each strain, or (iv) culture fluid containing products secreted by each strain. Eyes were assessed at various times following injection by slit lamp biomicroscopy, electroretinography (ERG), bacterial and inflammatory cell enumeration, and histology. B. cereus endophthalmitis followed a more rapid and virulent course than E. faecalis or S. aureus endophthalmitis, eliminating retinal responsiveness, as measured by ERG, by 12 h. Analysis of bacterial localization revealed that B. cereus uniquely migrated rapidly from posterior to anterior segment during infection. Although injection of neither metabolically inactive bacteria nor cell wall sacculi greatly affected ERG, significant intraocular inflammation was observed. Injection of B. cereus or S. aureus culture fluids caused both significant reductions in retinal responsiveness and significant intraocular inflammation, paralleling that seen in natural infections. The results demonstrate that toxins, intraocular localization, and, to a lesser extent, the intraocular host response to cell walls all contribute to the pathogenesis of B. cereus, S. aureus, and E. faecalis endophthalmitis in a pathogen-specific manner. The key pathophysiologic differences in these intraocular diseases highlight opportunities for optimizing conventional therapies and deriving new ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.