Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10377112›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1999

Pathogenesis of gram-positive bacterial endophthalmitis.

M C Callegan, M C Booth, B D Jett, M S Gilmore

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Endophthalmitis Caused byAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  12. Virulence-related genotypic differences amongFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. TheMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2021
    Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M C CalleganDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dean A. McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
M C Booth
B D Jett
M S Gilmore
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

TOXINS AND ENDOPHTHALMITISR01EY008289 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI GILMORE, MICHAEL S, GREGORY-KSANDER, MEREDITH · 1989 to 2012
$3.7M
MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF BACILLUS CEREUS ENDOPHTHALMITIF32EY006813 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI CALLEGAN, MICHELLE C · 1997 to 1998
–
FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SEVERITY OF ENDOPHTHALMITISR29EY010867 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI BOOTH, MARY C · 1995 to 1998
–
NEI NIH HHS EY06813NEI NIH HHS EY08289NEI NIH HHS EY10867NEI NIH HHS F32 EY006813NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severity of endophthalmitis has been associated generally with the virulence of the offending pathogen. However, precisely what constitutes the virulence in intraocular infections remains ill defined. We therefore sought to identify the basis for virulence for three common ocular pathogens (Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus aureus) in terms of intraocular growth rates, bacterial localization patterns, and the contribution of cell walls and secreted products to the pathogenesis of endophthalmitis. Rabbit eyes were injected intravitreally with (i) viable B. cereus, E. faecalis, or S. aureus, (ii) metabolically inactive B. cereus, E. faecalis, or S. aureus, (iii) sacculus preparations from each strain, or (iv) culture fluid containing products secreted by each strain. Eyes were assessed at various times following injection by slit lamp biomicroscopy, electroretinography (ERG), bacterial and inflammatory cell enumeration, and histology. B. cereus endophthalmitis followed a more rapid and virulent course than E. faecalis or S. aureus endophthalmitis, eliminating retinal responsiveness, as measured by ERG, by 12 h. Analysis of bacterial localization revealed that B. cereus uniquely migrated rapidly from posterior to anterior segment during infection. Although injection of neither metabolically inactive bacteria nor cell wall sacculi greatly affected ERG, significant intraocular inflammation was observed. Injection of B. cereus or S. aureus culture fluids caused both significant reductions in retinal responsiveness and significant intraocular inflammation, paralleling that seen in natural infections. The results demonstrate that toxins, intraocular localization, and, to a lesser extent, the intraocular host response to cell walls all contribute to the pathogenesis of B. cereus, S. aureus, and E. faecalis endophthalmitis in a pathogen-specific manner. The key pathophysiologic differences in these intraocular diseases highlight opportunities for optimizing conventional therapies and deriving new ones.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndophthalmitisGram-Positive BacteriaGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsRabbitsVirulence

Identifiers

PMID10377112
PMCPMC116517
OpenAlexW2132658744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.