Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis1999
Efficacy of abciximab induced platelet blockade using a rapid point of care assay.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of different thrombolytic treatment regimen with abciximab and tirofiban on platelet aggregation and platelet-leukocyte interactions: a subgroup analysis from the GUSTO V and FASTER trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2002Article
- Assessing the optimal level of platelet inhibition with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing coronary intervention. Rationale and design of the GOLD study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anciximab provides potent, but variable degrees of platelet inhibition both during the duration of intravenous administration and at 12 hours following therapy. Platelet function was assessed using the PC-RPFA system in 78 patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary revascularization who were administered the standard abciximab weight-adjusted bolus and 12-hour infusion. The PC-RPFA system is a cartridge-based, semiautomated point-of-care whole-blood assay that incorporates fibrinogen-coated polystyrene beads, buffers, and a modified thrombin receptor activating peptide (Isotrap) in lyophilized form. The instrument detects the agglutination rate between the stimulated platelets and the fibrinogen-coated beads, and provides a quantitative digital display in less than 2 minutes. No differences in the level of platelet inhibition were observed in these abciximab-treated patients by diabetic status, gender, smoking, diagnosis (unstable angina, chronic stable angina, recent myocardial infarction), or abciximab treatment status (first time vs. retreatment). Nocorrelation of the PC-RPFA rate of platelet aggregation with clinical demographic factors was observed, with the exception of baseline hematocrit (r2 = 0.4556). The relationship between the PC-RPFA rate of aggregation and hematocrit reflects light absorbance by erythrocytes and is specific to the PC-RPFA system. The absolute rate of platelet aggregation (slope) reported by the PC-RPFA is correlated with percent aggregation, thus making it potentially possible to predict the level of aggregation without reference to a baseline (pretreatment) measure of platelet function. This correlation was closest for patients having <40% baseline aggregation (r2 = 0.55). Thus, PC-RPFA provides a rapid point-of-care assessment of platelet function that could allow for adjustment of abciximab dosing to achieve targeted levels of platelet inhibition. The utility of this device to optimize therapy with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors is currently being evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.