Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10373541›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1999

Homeoproteins CDP and SATB1 interact: potential for tissue-specific regulation.

J Liu, A Barnett, E J Neufeld, J P Dudley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J LiuDepartment of Microbiology and Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
A Barnett
E J Neufeld
J P Dudley
Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FRHarvard University · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION AND TUMORIGENESIS BY MMTVR01CA034780 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI DUDLEY, JAQUELIN PAGE · 1985 to 2002
$821k
PROGRAM PHYSICIAN SCIENTIST AWARDK12DK001977 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI LUX, SAMUEL E · 1990 to 1998
–
REPRESSOR FUNCTION IN MYELOID GENE EXPRESSIONR29HL049196 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI NEUFELD, ELLIS J · 1993 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA34780NHLBI NIH HHS HL49196NIDDK NIH HHS DK01977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homeoproteins are known to participate in development and cell type specification. The homeoproteins CCAAT displacement protein (CDP) and special AT-rich sequence binding protein 1 (SATB1) have been shown to bind to nuclear matrix-associated regions and to act as repressors of many cellular genes. Moreover, binding of SATB1 to the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter region dramatically affects the tissue-specific transcription of this retrovirus. Because protein-protein interactions are a common means of regulating homeoprotein function, we tested whether SATB1 and CDP interact in vivo and in vitro. SATB1 interacted with CDP through its DNA-binding domain, as demonstrated by glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays. GST pull-down assays also showed that CDP associated with SATB1 through three of its four DNA-binding domains (CR1, CR2, and the homeodomain). SATB1-specific antisera, but not preimmune sera, precipitated CDP from nuclear extracts, and CDP-specific antisera precipitated SATB1 from the same extracts. Far-Western blotting detected interaction of SATB1 and CDP in several different tissue extracts. Association of purified SATB1 and CDP in vitro resulted in the inability of each protein to bind to DNA in gel retardation assays. CDP overexpression in cultured T cells led to a loss of detectable SATB1 binding to the MMTV promoter region, as measured by gel shift experiments. CDP overexpression also elevated MMTV long terminal repeat reporter gene activity in transient-transfection assays, a result consistent with neutralization of the SATB1 repressor function in T cells. SATB1 is very abundant in certain tissues, particularly thymus, whereas CDP is relatively ubiquitous, except in certain terminally differentiated cell types. Because of the tissue and cell type distribution of SATB1 and CDP, we propose that the SATB1-to-CDP ratio in different tissues is a novel mechanism for homeoproteins to control gene expression and differentiation in mammals.

Indexed as

Matrix Attachment Region Binding ProteinsAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell LineDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGlutathione TransferaseHomeodomain ProteinsHumansJurkat CellsMiceMinkNuclear ProteinsPrecipitin TestsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRepressor ProteinsCUX1 protein, humanCux1 protein, mouseDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGlutathione TransferaseHomeodomain ProteinsMatrix Attachment Region Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSATB1 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10373541
PMCPMC84297
OpenAlexW2156020527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.