Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10373168›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

Antenatal HIV testing: assessment of a routine voluntary approach.

W M Simpson, F D Johnstone, D J Goldberg, S M Gormley, G J Hart

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00503308 (Patient Perspectives and Testing Uptake With Abbreviated Versus Standard HIV Consenting in the Prenatal Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00503308 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

Patient Perspectives and Testing Uptake With Abbreviated Versus Standard HIV Consenting in the Prenatal Setting: A Randomized-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2006 to 2008Enrolled281ConditionsHIV Infections, Pregnancy RelatedArmsAbbreviated HIV test counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Updated CDC guidelines for HIV testing: a review for Wisconsin practitioners.WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin · 2008
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prenatal HIV tests. Routine testing or informed choice?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2003
    Article
  13. Opt in or opt out: what is optimal for prenatal screening for HIV infection?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003
    Review
  14. Mandatory reporting of HIV infection and opt-out prenatal screening for HIV infection: effect on testing rates.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003
    Article
  15. Failure to prevent perinatal HIV infection.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reducing vertical transmission of HIV in the UK.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W M SimpsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH3 9EW. wendy@lumsdenpark.freeserve.co.uk
F D Johnstone
D J Goldberg
S M Gormley
G J Hart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleVoluntary ProgramsAIDS SerodiagnosisFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisProgram EvaluationUnited KingdomEmpirical ApproachGenetics and ReproductionHealth Care and Public Health

Identifiers

PMID10373168
PMCPMC28144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.