Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10364591›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999

Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in fecal samples from infected individuals.

W A Gramley, A Asghar, H F Frierson, S M Powell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Noninvasive molecular analysis ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anaemia among clinically well under-fives attending a community health centre in Venda, Limpopo Province.South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde · 2010
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W A GramleyDepartments of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
A Asghar
H F Frierson
S M Powell
Indiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

GENETIC ALTERATIONS IN GASTRIC CARCINOMASR01CA067900 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI POWELL, STEVEN M · 2000 to 2004
$1.3M
GENETIC ALTERATIONS IN GASTRIC CARCINOMASR29CA067900 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI POWELL, STEVEN M · 1995 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA67900-04NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067900NCI NIH HHS R29 CA067900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stool, gastric biopsy, and serum samples were collected from 22 subjects. DNA from stool was extracted, amplified, and hybridized with primers specific for the 16S rRNA gene of Helicobacter pylori. DNA from gastric biopsy specimens was analyzed similarly for comparison. Universal primers were used to confirm successful extraction of DNA from samples. Histologic, serologic, and DNA analyses were scored in a blinded fashion. Universal primer amplification verified successful DNA extraction from all stool and gastric tissue specimens. The gastric tissue DNA assay was positive for H. pylori in 11 of the 22 subjects, correlating completely with histologic and serologic results. Stool DNA was positive for H. pylori by our molecular assay in 8 of these 11 H. pylori-positive subjects. All subjects who were negative by histologic, serologic, and gastric tissue DNA analyses were also negative by stool DNA analysis. Compared to histology, serology, and gastric tissue DNA analyses, the sensitivity of our stool DNA assay was 73%, with a specificity of 100%.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFecesGastric MucosaHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansObserver VariationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSingle-Blind MethodDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID10364591
PMCPMC85126
OpenAlexW2145537685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.