Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10364121›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

General practitioners' experiences of patients' complaints: qualitative study.

A Jain, J Ogden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prudent Physician Anger in Patient-Physician Interactions.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Personal and Professional Impact of Patients' Complaints on Doctors-A Qualitative Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A meta-ethnography of the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of patient complaints processes in health-care settings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A JainDepartment of General Practice, Guy's, Kings and St Thomas's Medical Schools, Kings College London SE11 6SP.
J Ogden

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how general practitioners experience patients' complaints.

settingGeneral practices in Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham health authority.

participantsRepresentative sample of 30 general practitioners who had had complaints made against them under either the old or new complaints system.

designQualitative study with detailed interviews.

resultsParticipants described their experiences of patients' complaints in three stages: initial impact, conflict, and resolution. The first stage described being out of control, feelings of shock and panic, and a sense of indignation towards patients generally. The second stage described the many conflicts generated by the complaint: emotional conflicts such as feelings of anger, depression, and even suicide, conflicts around aspects of professional identity including doubts about clinical competence, conflicts with family and colleagues, and conflicts arising from the management of the complaint. The third stage described a sense of resolution. For many this meant practising defensively, for others it meant planning to leave general practice, and for a minority no resolution was achieved. Not all participants, however, reported such a negative experience. Some described how they had become immune to complaints, and a small minority described the complaint as a learning experience.

conclusionThe initial impact stage and conflict stage may be necessary aspects of the experience that general practitioners endure when they have a complaint made against them. Support structures should, however, be in place to help general practitioners through these stages.

Indexed as

Family PracticePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansLondonMalePerceptionPhysicians, FamilyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Professional Practice

Identifiers

PMID10364121
PMCPMC28140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.