ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1999
Clonal dynamics of progressive neoplastic transformation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Degrees and kinds of selection in spontaneous neoplastic transformation: an operational analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005Article
- Coculturing diverse clonal populations prevents the early-stage neoplastic progression that occurs in the separate clones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a recent study, we found that newly isolated clones of NIH 3T3 mouse cells undergo neoplastic transformation more readily than uncloned cultures from which they were derived. After eleven low-density passages (LDPs), most of the 29 clones produced lightly stained early-stage transformed foci when grown to confluence in a primary assay for transformation, and one of them consistently produced a few tiny dense foci. In the present work, six of the clones were kept in LDPs for 56 passages and assayed for focus formation at confluence at six passage levels. The clone that produced tiny dense foci switched to light foci during the LDPs, four others produced light foci at different passage levels, and one progressed from light to dense foci after the last passage. By contrast, all the clones progressed to dense focus formation in five or fewer serial repetitions of the assay at confluence. Because all but one of the clones underwent about half as many total divisions at each LDP as they did when grown to the stationary state at confluence, the latter is more efficient in eliciting progression than the exponential growth of the LDPs. Extension of the period at confluence of uncloned cultures results in the appearance of dense foci within light foci. Because the latter are localized clonal populations, the intrafocal progression reinforces the conclusion that clonal expansion favors transformation. We discuss the significance of these results for the clonal origin of human cancer and the increased incidence of cancer with age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.