Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10358684›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health1999

Characteristics of nurse-midwife patients and visits, 1991.

L L Paine, J M Lang, D M Strobino, T R Johnson, J F DeJoseph, E R Declercq, D R Gagnon, A Scupholme, A Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L L PaineDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Boston University School of Public Health, MA 02118, USA. lpaine@bu.edu
J M Lang
D M Strobino
T R Johnson
J F DeJoseph
E R Declercq
D R Gagnon
A Scupholme
A Ross

Funding

PHS HHS MCJ259501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study describes the patient populations served by and visits made to certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) in the United States.

methodsProspective data on 16,729 visits were collected from 369 CNMs randomly selected from a 1991 population survey. Population estimates were derived from a multistage survey design with probability sampling.

resultsWe estimated that approximately 5.4 million visits were made to nearly 3000 CNMs nationwide in 1991. Most visits involved maternity care, although fully 20% were for care outside the maternity cycle. Patients considered vulnerable to poor access or outcomes made 7 of every 10 visits.

conclusionsNurse-midwives substantially contribute to the health care of women nationwide, especially for vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCertificationFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNurse MidwivesOffice VisitsPatient Acceptance of Health CareProspective StudiesSalaries and Fringe BenefitsSampling StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID10358684
PMCPMC1508644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.