Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10356011›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

General practitioners' perceptions of effective health care.

Z Tomlin, C Humphrey, S Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Met or matched expectations: what accounts for a successful back pain consultation in primary care?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Qualitative research and its uses in health care.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2008
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Z TomlinDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London NW3 2PF.
C Humphrey
S Rogers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore general practitioners' perceptions of effective health care and its application in their own practice; to examine how these perceptions relate to assumptions about clinicians' values and behaviour implicit in the evidence based medicine approach.

designA qualitative study using semistructured interviews.

settingEight general practices in North Thames region that were part of the Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework.

participants24 general practitioners, three from each practice.

main outcome measuresRespondents' definitions of effective health care, reasons for not practising effectively according to their own criteria, sources of information used to answer clinical questions about patients, reasons for making changes in clinical practice.

resultsThree categories of definitions emerged: clinical, patient related, and resource related. Patient factors were the main reason given for not practising effectively; others were lack of time, doctors' lack of knowledge and skills, lack of resources, and "human failings." Main sources of information used in situations of clinical uncertainty were general practitioner partners and hospital doctors. Contact with hospital doctors and observation of hospital practice were just as likely as information from medical and scientific literature to bring about changes in clinical practice.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that the central assumptions of the evidence based medicine paradigm may not be shared by many general practitioners, making its application in general practice problematic. The promotion of effective care in general practice requires a broader vision and a more pragmatic approach which takes account of practitioners' concerns and is compatible with the complex nature of their work.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelQuality of Health CareAdultEnglandEvidence-Based MedicineFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, FamilyPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID10356011
PMCPMC27897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.