ArticleBiophysical journal1999
Measurement of calcium channel inactivation is dependent upon the test pulse potential.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beta-adrenergic and muscarinic agonists modulate inactivation of L-type Ca2+ channel currents in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes.The Journal of physiology · 2002Article
- Voltage- and cation-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca2+ channel currents in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes.The Journal of physiology · 2002Article
- beta-Adrenergic stimulation modulates Ca2+- and voltage-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca2+ channel currents in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes.The Journal of physiology · 2002Article
- Voltage- and calcium-dependent inactivation of calcium channels in Lymnaea neurons.The Journal of general physiology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have developed two methods to measure Ca2+ channel inactivation in Lymnaea neurons-one method, based upon the conventional double-pulse protocol, uses currents during a moderately large depolarizing pulse, and the other uses tail currents after a very strong activating pulse. Both methods avoid contamination by proton currents and are unaffected by rundown of Ca2+ current. The magnitude of inactivation measured differs for the two methods; this difference arises because the measurement of inactivation is inherently dependent upon the test pulse voltage used to monitor the Ca2+ channel conductance. We discuss two models that can generate such test pulse dependence of inactivation measurements-a two-channel model and a two-open-state model. The first model accounts for this by assuming the existence of two types of Ca2+ channels, different proportions of which are activated by the different test pulses. The second model assumes only one Ca2+ channel type, with two closed and open states; in this model, the test pulse dependence is due to the differential activation of channels in the two closed states by the test pulses. Test pulse dependence of inactivation measurements of Ca2+ channels may be a general phenomenon that has been overlooked in previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.