Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10351187›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics1999

The effect of managed care on prescription drug costs and benefits.

A Lyles, F B Palumbo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Does managed care reduce health care expenditure? Evidence from spatial panel data.International journal of health care finance and economics · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A LylesDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ALYLES@jhsph.edu
F B Palumbo
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses the approaches to prescription drug payment practices taken by managed care to influence drug use and costs, and presents the research evidence supporting these interventions. In the US, drugs were infrequently covered as an ambulatory benefit under fee-for-service indemnity insurance; however, health maintenance organisations almost always provide outpatient drugs and consequently have developed approaches to influence drug use and manage its costs. Managed care as a set of tools and as an organisational form is moving toward more restrictions on direct access to pharmaceuticals as a covered benefit. Options for influencing drug use and cost may address access, ingredient costs, dispensing fees and cost sharing. The formulary process is the foundation for a managed pharmacy benefit and integrates these options. The limited empirical evidence for an effect of managed care on drug costs and use is reviewed. A proposed research agenda includes evaluation of the effects of restrictive formularies, capitation, disease management and other programmes to influence the cost and use of pharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

Prescription FeesCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumansManaged Care Programs

Identifiers

PMID10351187
OpenAlexW2086682814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.