Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10346775›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999

Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies.

H Hemingway, M Marmot

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00005680 (Whitehall II - Social and Occupational Influences On Health and Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 314 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
314citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00005680 completednot on this map

Whitehall II - Social and Occupational Influences On Health and Illness

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Ran1993 to 2007ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Coronary Disease, Myocardial Ischemia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

314 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Unmet psychosocial needs in haematological cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

254 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H HemingwayInternational Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London WC1E 6BT. h.hemingway@public-health.ucl.ac.uk
M Marmot

Funding

Socio-economic status and heterogeneity in agingR01AG013196 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI MARMOT, MICHAEL G, SINGH-MANOUX, ARCHANA · 1996 to 2013
$3.5M
Socioeconomic gradient in CHD in early old ageR01HL036310 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · PI KIVIMAKI, MIKA J, MARMOT, MICHAEL G · 1986 to 2012
$3.1M
SOCIAL FACTORS INFLUENCING MEDICAL OUTCOME MEASURESR01HS006516 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · PI MARMOT, MICHAEL G · 1990 to 1995
–
AHRQ HHS 5 RO1 HS06516Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G8802774NHLBI NIH HHS 2RO1 HL36310NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL036310NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013196NIA NIH HHS R01 AG13196-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Psychology, SocialAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyCohort StudiesCoronary DiseaseDepressionFemaleHostilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID10346775
PMCPMC1115843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.