ReviewPharmacoEconomics1998
Clinical positioning of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in lipid management protocols.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- L-Theanine Ameliorates Obesity-Related Complications Induced by High-Fat Diet in Mice: Insights from Transcriptomics and Metabolomics.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Research trends in contemporary health economics: a scientometric analysis on collective content of specialty journals.Health economics review · 2024Review
- Augmenting reference pricing of pharmaceuticals in New Zealand with strategic cross-product agreements.PharmacoEconomics · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug treatment of dyslipidaemia has progressed dramatically over the past decade. Of the available drugs, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have emerged as very effective and important treatments for dyslipidaemia. These agents potently reduce low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (the main lipid target in management protocols and treatment guidelines) and have produced significant reductions in coronary heart disease (CHD) related morbidity and mortality, as well as overall mortality, in large intervention studies. They have also been shown to reduce progression and increase regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Statins are generally well tolerated and are thus associated with high patient compliance in comparison with the other classes of medications used for dyslipidaemia. There are minimal studies to date with these agents in patients with elevated triglycerides, either with or without accompanying elevated cholesterol levels. Preliminary results with statins in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia are promising, with reductions in triglycerides of 26 and 46%, respectively, having been reported following treatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin. Therefore, statins can be considered first-line drugs in many patients with elevated total and/or LDL-cholesterol levels according to treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.