Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10339526›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1999

Use of plant roots for phytoremediation and molecular farming.

D Gleba, N V Borisjuk, L G Borisjuk, R Kneer, A Poulev, M Skarzhinskaya, S Dushenkov, S Logendra, Y Y Gleba, I Raskin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Plant-bacteria partnerships for the remediation of persistent organic pollutants.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Improving the efficiency of phytoremediation using electrically charged plant and chelating agents.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Phytoremediation.EMBO reports · 2005
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

D GlebaBiotech Center, Foran Hall, Cook College, Rutgers University, 59 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA.
N V Borisjuk
L G Borisjuk
R Kneer
A Poulev
M Skarzhinskaya
S Dushenkov
S Logendra
Y Y Gleba
I Raskin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative agriculture, which expands the uses of plants well beyond food and fiber, is beginning to change plant biology. Two plant-based biotechnologies were recently developed that take advantage of the ability of plant roots to absorb or secrete various substances. They are (i) phytoextraction, the use of plants to remove pollutants from the environment and (ii) rhizosecretion, a subset of molecular farming, designed to produce and secrete valuable natural products and recombinant proteins from roots. Here we discuss recent advances in these technologies and assess their potential in soil remediation, drug discovery, and molecular farming.

Indexed as

SoilSoil PollutantsAgricultureAnimalsBiotechnologyPlant RootsPlants, Genetically ModifiedRecombinant ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID10339526
PMCPMC34214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.