Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10339452›Full record

Trial reportEnvironmental health perspectives1999

Cytogenetic effects from exposure to mixed pesticides and the influence from genetic susceptibility.

W W Au, C H Sierra-Torres, N Cajas-Salazar, B K Shipp, M S Legator

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Environmental health perspectives, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating the effects of genetic variants of DNA repair genes using cytogenetic mutagen sensitivity approaches.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The use of pesticides in a Polish rural population and its effect on birth weight.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2003
    Article
  11. The role of genetic polymorphisms in environmental health.Environmental health perspectives · 2003
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W W AuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1110, USA. william.au@utmb.edu
C H Sierra-Torres
N Cajas-Salazar
B K Shipp
M S Legator
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Synthetic Organic Chemistry CoreP30ES006676 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI ELFERINK, CORNELIS JOHAN · 1995 to 2017
$21.7M
Molecular Mechanisms of Environmental InjuryT32ES007254 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI AMEREDES, BILL T · 1990 to 2022
$6.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES 06676NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES 07254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to pesticides remains a major environmental health problem. Health risk from such exposure needs to be more precisely understood. We conducted three different cytogenetic assays to elucidate the biological effects of exposure to mixed pesticides in 20 Costa Rica farmers (all nonsmokers) compared with 20 matched controls. The farmers were also exposed to dibromochloropropane during the early employment years, and most of them experienced sterility/fertility problems. Our data show that the farmers had consistently higher frequencies of chromosome aberrations, as determined by the standard chromosome aberration assay, and significantly abnormal DNA repair responses (p < 0.05), as determined by the challenge assay, but no statistically significant differences in the tandem-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay (p > 0.05). Genotype analysis indicates that farmers with certain "unfavorable" versions of polymorphic metabolizing genes (cytochrome P4502E1, the glutathione S-transferases mu and theta, and the paraoxonase genes) had significantly more biological effects, as determined by all three cytogenetic assays, than both the farmers with the "favorable" alleles and the matched controls. A unique observation is that, in individuals who had inherited any of the mentioned "unfavorable" alleles, farmers were consistently underrepresented. In conclusion, the Costa Rican farmers were exposed to genotoxic agents, most likely pesticides, which expressed the induction of biological and adverse health effects. The farmers who had inherited "unfavorable" metabolizing alleles were more susceptible to genotoxic effects than those with "favorable" alleles. Our genotype data suggest that the well-recognized "healthy worker effect" may be influenced by unrecognized occupational selection pressure against genetically susceptible individuals.

Indexed as

AdultAgricultural Workers' DiseasesAllelesChromosome AberrationsCosta RicaDNA RepairGenotypeHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMutagenicity TestsMutagensPesticidesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthMutagensPesticides

Identifiers

PMID10339452
PMCPMC1566563
OpenAlexW1993541953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.