Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10337008›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology1999

Are anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) clinically useful in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)?

C Roozendaal, C G Kallenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Human intestinal B cells in inflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Patterns of airway involvement in inflammatory bowel diseases.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C RoozendaalDepartment of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
C G Kallenberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first detection of ANCA in IBD, numerous studies have dealt with their prevalence, antigenic specificities, clinical significance, pathophysiological role, and their induction. This review summarizes the information obtained from those studies and shows that ANCA are not directly useful as diagnostic and prognostic factors in IBD. ANCA were detected in 50-85% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 10-20% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Multiple target antigens are recognized by these autoantibodies, including both cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins. A pathophysiological role for ANCA in IBD is far from clear. On the one hand, it is suggested that ANCA are genetic markers of susceptibility for IBD, and on the other hand, the induction of ANCA in those diseases may just be an epiphenomenon of chronic inflammation. We discuss recent evidence that ANCA may be induced by a break-through of tolerance towards bacterial antigens.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicAntigens, BacterialBiomarkersCross ReactionsEpitopesHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAntibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicAntigens, BacterialBiomarkersEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID10337008
PMCPMC1905286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.