Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10336915›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)1999

Waiting times and prioritization for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand.

M E Seddon, J K French, D J Amos, K Ramanathan, S C McLaughlin, H D White

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Surge After the Surge: Cardiac Surgery Post-COVID-19.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Access, equity and the role of rights in health care.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2006
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Waiting in the NHS, part 2: a change of prescription.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2002
    Article
  19. Impact of waiting time on the quality of life of patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M E SeddonCardiovascular Research Unit, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
J K French
D J Amos
K Ramanathan
S C McLaughlin
H D White

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the New Zealand coronary artery bypass priority score instituted in May 1996, and specifically to determine whether it prioritizes patients at high risk of cardiac events while waiting. The New Zealand score is compared with the Ontario urgency rating score, and waiting times for surgery are compared with the maximum times recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.

designRetrospective review of patients accepted for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between 1 January 1993 and 31 January 1996.

settingGreen Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

main outcome measuresWaiting time, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cardiac readmission.

resultsThe median waiting times were five days for hospital cases (n = 721) and 146 days for out of hospital cases (n = 701). Of the latter group, 28% waited more than a year, 33% had their surgery expedited because of worsening symptoms, and 19% failed to meet the cut off point set by the New Zealand score for acceptance onto the list. Twenty two patients died, 18 on the outpatient waiting list (waiting list mortality 2.6%, risk 0.28% per month of waiting), and 132 were readmitted, 12% with myocardial infarction and 76% with unstable angina. Risk factors for a composite end point of death or myocardial infarction and/or cardiac readmission were: previous coronary artery bypass surgery (p = 0. 001), class III or IV angina (p = 0.002), and hypertension (p = 0. 005). The New Zealand score did not identify those at risk. Excluding hospital cases, 32% had surgery within the time recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.

conclusionsWaiting times for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand are considerably longer than those in Ontario, Canada. By using a numerical cut off point, implementation of the New Zealand priority scoring system has restricted access to coronary surgery on the basis of funding constraints rather than clinical appropriateness. The score does not add greatly to the clinicians' prioritization in predicting those patients who will suffer events while waiting.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassPatient SelectionSeverity of Illness IndexWaiting ListsAdultAgedCoronary DiseaseFemaleHealth Care RationingHealth PrioritiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandOntarioPatient Readmission

Identifiers

PMID10336915
PMCPMC1729055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.