Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10330363›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1999

Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative traits.

D B Allison, M Heo, N Kaplan, E R Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Family-based association mapping in crop species.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Choice of study phenotype in osteoporosis genetic research.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2009
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Gene-lifecourse interaction for alcohol consumption in adolescence and young adulthood: five monoamine genes.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2007
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D B AllisonObesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10025, USA. dba8@columbia.edu
M Heo
N Kaplan
E R Martin

Funding

RESEARCH TRAININGP30DK026687 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI Anthony W Ferrante, DYMPNA GALLAGHER · 1986 to 2026
$33.0M
QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS OF CLINICAL OBESITY RESEARCHR01DK051716 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI ALLISON, DAVID B · 1996 to 1999
–
GENETICS OF OBESITY AND RELATED RISKS AMONG BLACK WOMENR29DK047256 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI ALLISON, DAVID B · 1994 to 1998
–
NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK26687NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK51716NIDDK NIH HHS R29DK47256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) developed by Spielman et al. can be a powerful family-based test of linkage and, in some cases, a test of association as well as linkage. It has recently been extended in several ways; these include allowance for implementation with quantitative traits, allowance for multiple alleles, and, in the case of dichotomous traits, allowance for testing in the absence of parental data. In this article, these three extensions are combined, and two procedures are developed that offer valid joint tests of linkage and (in the case of certain sibling configurations) association with quantitative traits, with use of data from siblings only, and that can accommodate biallelic or multiallelic loci. The first procedure uses a mixed-effects (i.e., random and fixed effects) analysis of variance in which sibship is the random factor, marker genotype is the fixed factor, and the continuous phenotype is the dependent variable. Covariates can easily be accommodated, and the procedure can be implemented in commonly available statistical software. The second procedure is a permutation-based procedure. Selected power studies are conducted to illustrate the relative power of each test under a variety of circumstances.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageNuclear FamilyQuantitative Trait, HeritableHumansModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID10330363
PMCPMC1377919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.