Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10330128›Full record

ArticleGenome research1999

Loss of heterozygosity analysis using whole genome amplification, cell sorting, and fluorescence-based PCR.

T G Paulson, P C Galipeau, B J Reid

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A Perspective.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Double inactivation of NF1 in tibial pseudarthrosis.American journal of human genetics · 2006
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Molecular and genetic analysis of disseminated neoplastic cells in lymphangioleiomyomatosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T G PaulsonPrograms in Cancer Biology and GI Oncology, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.
P C Galipeau
B J Reid
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

PHYLOGENIES of Barrett's Esophagus LineagesP01CA091955 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 2002 to 2019
$35.9M
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON GI TRAINING GRANTT32DK007742 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 1996 to 2022
$4.7M
MUTAGEN SENSITIVITY &PROGRESSION IN BARRETTS ESOPHAGUSR01CA072030 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI FARROW, DIANA C · 1996 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA091955NIDDK NIH HHS DK07742NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007742PHS HHS R0161202PHS HHS R0172030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is a common genetic lesion found in many human neoplasms. Extending investigation of LOH to large-scale clinical and public health science studies has proven difficult because of the small size and cellular and genetic heterogeneity of human neoplasms, in addition to the challenges associated with increasing throughput. Our approach to LOH analysis was developed using clinical biopsy samples from patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and uses flow cytometric cell sorting to increase sample purity, whole genome amplification to increase sample amount, and automated fluorescent genotyping to increase sample throughput. This approach allows LOH assessment at 20 loci in DNA extracted from 1000 flow-purified cells while maintaining accurate and reproducible allele ratios compared with the standard method of using genomic DNA. This method of analysis should allow accurate, reproducible determination of allele ratios in a variety of human tumors and premalignant conditions.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAllelesAneuploidyFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHumansLoss of HeterozygosityPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID10330128
PMCPMC310769
OpenAlexW1923803423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.