Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10325913›Full record

Trial reportThorax1999

Effect of differing doses of inhaled budesonide on markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma.

A Jatakanon, S Kharitonov, S Lim, P J Barnes

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exhaled nitric oxide levels to guide treatment for children with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Budesonide at different doses for chronic asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Induced sputum: current progress and prospect.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exhaled nitric oxide levels to guide treatment for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Biomarkers in the Management of Difficult Asthma.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Exhaled nitric oxide predicts persistence of wheezing, exacerbations, and decline in lung function in wheezy infants and toddlers.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A JatakanonDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine at National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
S Kharitonov
S Lim
P J Barnes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is desirable to prescribe the minimal effective dose of inhaled steroids to control asthma. To ensure that inflammation is suppressed whilst using the lowest possible dose, a sensitive and specific method for assessing airway inflammation is needed.

methodsThe usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide (NO), sputum eosinophils, and methacholine airway responsiveness (PC20) for monitoring airway inflammatory changes following four weeks of treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide via Turbohaler) were compared. Mild stable steroid naive asthmatic subjects were randomised into two double blind, placebo controlled studies. The first was a parallel group study involving three groups receiving either 100 micrograms/day budesonide (n = 8), 400 micrograms/day budesonide (n = 7), or a matched placebo (n = 6). The second was a crossover study involving 10 subjects randomised to receive 1600 micrograms budesonide or placebo. The groups were matched with respect to age, PC20, baseline FEV1 (% predicted), exhaled NO, and sputum eosinophilia.

resultsThere were significant improvements in FEV1 following 400 micrograms and 1600 micrograms budesonide (11.3% and 6.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). This was accompanied by significant reductions in eosinophil numbers in induced sputum (0.7 and 0.9 fold, p < 0.05). However, levels of exhaled NO were reduced following each budesonide dose while PC20 was improved only with 1600 micrograms budesonide. These results suggest that exhaled NO and PC20 may not reflect the control of airway inflammation as accurately as the number of eosinophils in sputum. There were dose dependent changes in exhaled NO, sputum eosinophils, and PC20 to inhaled budesonide but a plateau response of exhaled NO was found at a dose of 400 micrograms daily.

conclusionMonitoring the number of eosinophils in induced sputum may be the most accurate guide to establish the minimum dose of inhaled steroids needed to control inflammation. This, however, requires further studies involving a larger number of patients.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideCell CountDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEosinophilsFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleNitric OxideSputumVital CapacityBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID10325913
PMCPMC1745406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.