ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999
Enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in positive BACTEC 12B broth cultures of respiratory specimens.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical Validation of the Xpert MTB/RIF Test for Identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Acid-Fast Bacillus Smear-Positive MGIT Broth Cultures.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in contaminated BACTEC 12B broth cultures by testing with Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2001Article
- Use of the Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC 12B medium.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reliability of the Gen-Probe enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD) for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in BACTEC 12B broth cultures of respiratory specimens was evaluated by testing aliquots from 268 bottles with a growth index of >/=50. MTD results were compared to those obtained by usual laboratory protocol, whereby MTBC was identified by DNA probe (Gen-Probe, Inc.) testing sediment from broth samples or colonies on a solid medium. For the first 134 cultures, from which 68 mycobacterial isolates (including 27 MTBC isolates) were recovered, both fresh and frozen aliquots were tested. MTD results for the frozen aliquots agreed with the identification by usual protocol in all cases, whereas there was one false-negative MTD result with fresh aliquots. For the remaining 134 cultures, only frozen aliquots were tested. Of the total 268 broth cultures (from 210 patients) evaluated, 137 (51.1%) grew mycobacteria, including 60 MTBC isolates. All 60 isolates were MTD positive, as was one additional culture that grew Mycobacterium gordonae. The latter culture was from a patient who was diagnosed with tuberculosis a few months earlier and was on therapy; therefore, the MTD result was considered a true positive. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MTD were 100%. The mean times from specimen receipt to identification of MTBC were 15 (+/-1) days (range, 4 to 27 days) for BACTEC plus MTD and 19 (+/-1) days (range, 6 to 36 days) for the usual protocol (P < 0.001). These data indicate that the MTD is a rapid, reliable method for identification of MTBC in fresh or frozen aliquots of broth from positive BACTEC 12B cultures of respiratory specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.