Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10325330›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999

Use of PCR in diagnosis of human american tegumentary leishmaniasis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

C Pirmez, V da Silva Trajano, M Paes-Oliveira Neto, A M da-Cruz, S C Gonçalves-da-Costa, M Catanho, W Degrave, O Fernandes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Molecular Detection ofAdvanced biomedical research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A critical review of the applicability of serological screening for Leishmaniasis in blood banks in Brazil.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Species typing in dermal leishmaniasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C PirmezDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. pirmez@gene.dbbm.fiocruz.br
V da Silva Trajano
M Paes-Oliveira Neto
A M da-Cruz
S C Gonçalves-da-Costa
M Catanho
W Degrave
O Fernandes
Instituto Evandro Chagas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Brazil, the most common etiological agent of American tegumentary leishmaniasis is Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. In general, diagnostic techniques envisage the visualization of the parasite, but that technique has a low sensitivity. The main purpose of the present work was to evaluate the PCR as a routine tool for the diagnosis of leishmaniasis. Biopsy specimens from cutaneous or mucosal lesions were taken from 230 individuals from areas where Leishmania is endemic: 216 patients who had a clinical picture suggestive of leishmaniasis and 14 individuals with cutaneous lesions due to other causes. Each specimen was processed for histopathologic examination, culture, touch preparation, and DNA isolation. Oligonucleotides that amplify the conserved region of the minicircle molecules of Leishmania were used in a hot-start PCR. While at least one conventional technique was positive for Leishmania for 62% (134 of 216) of the patients, PCR coupled to hybridization was positive for 94% (203 of 216) of the patients. The 14 patients whose clinical picture was not suggestive of leishmaniasis had negative results by all techniques. The impact of the PCR was striking in mucosal disease. While the disease in only 17% (4 of 24) of the patients could be diagnosed by conventional techniques, PCR was positive for 71% (17 of 24) of the patients. Hybridization showed that all cases of disease were caused by parasites belonging to the Viannia subgenus. Altogether, the results indicate that PCR is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of leishmaniasis on a routine basis and is likely to provide valuable epidemiological information about the disease in countries where it is endemic.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiopsyBrazilColoring AgentsDNA, ProtozoanHumansLeishmania braziliensisLeishmaniasis, CutaneousOutpatientsPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySkinUrban PopulationColoring AgentsDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID10325330
PMCPMC84959
OpenAlexW2157915998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.