Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10318710›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology1999

K+-Selective inward-rectifying channels and apoplastic pH in barley roots

Amtmann, Jelitto, Sanders

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How Plants Tolerate Salt Stress.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Emergence of a novel calcium signaling pathway in plants: CBL-CIPK signaling network.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

AmtmannThe Plant Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of York, P.O. Box 373, York YO1 5YW, United Kingdom.
Jelitto
Sanders
University of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent structure-function analysis of heterologously expressed K+-selective inward-rectifying channels (KIRCs) from plants has revealed that external protons can have opposite effects on different members of the same gene family. An important question is how the diverse response of KIRCs to apoplastic pH is reflected at the tissue level. Activation of KIRCs by acid external pH is well documented for guard cells, but no other tissue has yet been studied. In this paper we present, for the first time to our knowledge, in planta characterization of the effects of apoplastic pH on KIRCs in roots. Patch-clamp experiments on protoplasts derived from barley (Hordeum vulgare) roots showed that a decrease in external pH shifted the half-activation potential to more positive voltages and increased the limit conductance. The resulting enhancement of the KIRC current, together with the characteristic voltage dependence, strongly relates the KIRC of barley root cells to AKT1-type as opposed to AKT3-type channels. Measurements of cell wall pH in barley roots with fluorescent dye revealed a bulk apoplastic pH close to the pK values of KIRC activation and significant acidification of the apoplast after the addition of fusicoccin. These results indicate that channel-mediated K+ uptake may be linked to development, growth, and stress responses of root cells via the activity of H+-translocating systems.

Identifiers

PMID10318710
PMCPMC59266
OpenAlexW2162414974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.